| |
|
Resultater 21 - 30 av ca. 30 | | | 26 November 2009 12:16 | | Now we have "Accusativus duplex syntax" in "Accusativus cum infinitivus syntax" (one syntax in another syntax ), but if we put "&" instaed of comma, it would completely change the meaning and the "accusativus duplex syntax" would disappear!
Look, please:
'Si enim dicamus praecedentes legales & hos prophetales esse,..."
"As if we said that the previous ones were legislative (=Law) and the prophetic books,..." (but still second hypothetical coditional)
| | 27 November 2009 22:43 | | In fact, if we say that the previous ones are the books of the law (and) that these ones are the prophetical books, someone could object that the prophetical books are the five books of Moyses, because they were composed by the greatest prophet.
This is my opinion... hope it could help!
| | 27 November 2009 23:09 | | Efee, as it is modus potentialis I insisted on 2nd conditional in English, so:
if we say --> if we said
the previous ones are --> the previous ones were
and so on... | | 28 November 2009 16:23 | | Yes, modus potentialis of course! | | 28 November 2009 21:31 | | It is almost fine.
One thing:
"praecedentes legales , hos prophetales esse"
- "the previous law book was the prophetical one"
but it should be in plural, so:
"the previous law books were the prophetical ones"
| | 28 November 2009 21:33 | | | | 28 November 2009 21:34 | | Just great! At last! | | 28 November 2009 21:36 | | Ufff! | | 28 November 2009 21:38 | | Yeaaah! Ufff! Thank you, Lilly. | | 29 November 2009 05:52 | | |
|
| |
|