Prevođenje - rain (Engleski)

Kfeto, this sentence is weird.

"If I loved you, it would rain in this city" would make more sense.

yes but that not what it says.
it not in the present and it's not conditional.

maybe like this then:

I don't know which of the French or English trannslation is the right one, but one of them is wrong : The French translation gives this: "When I have loved you in this town, it was raining". So one of them is wrong; At least it's my opinion
even if it seems that I"m the only one, who think that way.

You're not the only one who think this way, Gamine

When i loved u in that city,was raining

ok, i moved "in this city"
I translated from turkish btw

Why "city" and not "town". I know ,crazy question,
byt the word "town" is used quite often. If you use "city" it means that it's a big, big town. Up to you, I don't understand turkish.
GOOD EVENING.

no that's a reasonable question
because the turkish says sehir which is a city

is this the reason why you voted against?

When i loved you in this city, it would rain

I wouldn't use : It would rain, but -> "It rained" since it's written in past tense

When... it was raining.

The tense is incorrect. It should be "when I loved you in this city, it was raining." This is according to the Russian translation...

I voted wrong for this one, but I voted according to the French version. About the Turkish one I coul'nt say, as I don't know Turkish.

But from the French text, the English version would read : "When I loved you in this city, it was raining" (thus a different meaning here with the english)

Please also note : "quand je t'ai aimé" could also describe the act of making love to someone, and so it would be translated by "when I was making love to you..."

would je u pogresnom vremenu

When I loved you in this city, it was raining

wrong tense

I agree with Via Luminosa (I, too, compare with the Russian translation)

I know the tense is not the same as in french but i translated according to the original turkish.

which is in not the simple past, but the AORIST(timeless) past.
and it doesn't say when (-ken) but says( -im zaman)so it's closer to "the time(s) that/whenever"

NO!! OF COURSE NOT.I voted against because of the difference between the French and English translation and as I don't understand Turkish!!!

Whenever
When