Vote can be balanced, to avoid goodwish replacing justice.

I have to point out this problem again that:

when I am invited to vote for a doubted translation, I find it is not suitable that, if I vote for it, the system does not allow me to comment, even when I don't think the work is perfectly done; so if I want to vote for but I still want to edit or suggest better solutions, how can I choose? You know, it is rather boring if I vote for it and then return to the comment page of it. I have to ask the administrator to give me a way to vote for and comment at the same time.


The fact is, there is only comment field beside the vote against option, so this is misleading, for example, if I am lazy, I would prefer to vote for, instead of vote against, because I don't want to comment any thing. And the result will be like that, votes for will be much more than votes against.

I don't think the comment is compulsory, but if you begin it biased, I could not imagine it will be ended just and fair. So,

Why not attach one comment field also to the Vote For option? even if it is not compulsory?

OK I will look at this problem soon.

CC: lilian canale

This is done now. When you rate "yes" or "no", you are invited to post your opinion.

CC: pluiepoco lilian canale

Thanks again JP!

following your suggestions, I'ev added a new choice decrived here :Improvement wave 2008.

Thank you, jp.
Cucumis will be better after each improvement.