| |
|
नतिजा 21 - 30 (जम्मा लगभग 30) | | | 2009年 नोभेम्बर 26日 12:16 | | Now we have "Accusativus duplex syntax" in "Accusativus cum infinitivus syntax" (one syntax in another syntax ), but if we put "&" instaed of comma, it would completely change the meaning and the "accusativus duplex syntax" would disappear!
Look, please:
'Si enim dicamus praecedentes legales & hos prophetales esse,..."
"As if we said that the previous ones were legislative (=Law) and the prophetic books,..." (but still second hypothetical coditional)
| | 2009年 नोभेम्बर 27日 22:43 | | In fact, if we say that the previous ones are the books of the law (and) that these ones are the prophetical books, someone could object that the prophetical books are the five books of Moyses, because they were composed by the greatest prophet.
This is my opinion... hope it could help!
| | 2009年 नोभेम्बर 27日 23:09 | | Efee, as it is modus potentialis I insisted on 2nd conditional in English, so:
if we say --> if we said
the previous ones are --> the previous ones were
and so on... | | 2009年 नोभेम्बर 28日 16:23 | | Yes, modus potentialis of course! | | 2009年 नोभेम्बर 28日 21:31 | | It is almost fine.
One thing:
"praecedentes legales , hos prophetales esse"
- "the previous law book was the prophetical one"
but it should be in plural, so:
"the previous law books were the prophetical ones"
| | 2009年 नोभेम्बर 28日 21:33 | | | | 2009年 नोभेम्बर 28日 21:34 | | Just great! At last! | | 2009年 नोभेम्बर 28日 21:36 | | Ufff! | | 2009年 नोभेम्बर 28日 21:38 | | Yeaaah! Ufff! Thank you, Lilly. | | 2009年 नोभेम्बर 29日 05:52 | | |
|
| |
|