| |
| 14 Fevereiro 2008 13:17 |
GarretNúmero de Mensagens: 168 | I think you`ve transleted all correctly. =) |
| 14 Fevereiro 2008 14:32 |
| It could be "I wish you to love me for one day". But I don't believe it is...
I really think it's high time for this translation to be verified. How much longer it will linger? |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 08:56 |
| Hi ViaLuminosa
It will linger no longer!!
Sorry it took so long (we have 130 odd evaluations to deal with in English )
This looks good, I like both of your suggestions, why not paste your alternative in the comments box?
I'll have to poll 'cos I don't speak Russian a part maybe from "Spassiba" (hope that's right
Bises
Tantine |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 09:08 |
| No problem, Tantine. Oh, it's good when an expert has a work to do... |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 11:53 |
| Original form of translation before edits:
I wish you to love me one day. |
| 17 Fevereiro 2008 04:54 |
| I want you to love me for a day...(corrected)
I hope you will love me one day - Ñ Ð½Ð°Ð´ÐµÑŽÑÑŒ вы полюбите Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð½Ð° один день.
I wish you could love me for one day - Ñ Ñ…Ð¾Ñ‚ÐµÐ» бы, чтобы вы полюбили Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð½Ð° один день. |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 12:46 |
LinakNúmero de Mensagens: 48 | I wish you would love me one day. |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 13:45 |
| Hmmm...
*"I want you love me for a day..."
is not correct grammar in English, and
"I wish you would love me one day."
needs a "for," i.e.
I wish you would love me for one day.
if it means
...only for one day.
But if it means
...someday.
in order to make it correct English, I think we have to change the auxiliary verb to "could":
I wish you could love me someday.
ViaLuminosa, what do you think the meaning is here? |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 14:22 |
| "I wish you to love me for one day"
This is word-for-word translation.
If the grammar is correct it should be that |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 14:27 |
| The context is very clear, as for me...
I wish you to love me for one day, the key word here is "желаю" - "wish".
Maybe nurlocas hasn't expressed clearly what she want to say but it's her fault. |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 20:37 |
| because right will be not hope but wish |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 21:03 |
| The analogue in Bulgarian is "I wish you to love me someday". I don't believe the connotation to be "...for one day", cause this would have another lexical form in Russian, as Siberia suggested. "Wish you" pertains to the receiver, not the speaker, like in "wish you happiness". |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 22:27 |
| Hi All
Maybe "I hope one day (that) you will love me"
I have put "that" in inverted commas because it may be superfluous.
What do you all think?
Bises
Tantine |
| 16 Fevereiro 2008 23:08 |
| No, Tantine, this has nothing to do with the text. The speaker addresses a wish to the receiver, as we do when congratulating birthday for instance. The verb "wish" is in sense "to wish smb. smth." and not "to wish myself/desire/hope for smth."
A woman extends her wishes to a man on unknown occasion.
Maybe it better be "I wish you loving me someday". :-P |
| 17 Fevereiro 2008 08:24 |
| I wish you to love me one day |
| 17 Fevereiro 2008 09:35 |
| Yes, arcobaleno, this was my first suggestion. But we digressed seeking non-existing meanings and little by little the whole idea of this small line was twisted...
And it's so simple, after all - a woman provokes a man by wishing him loving her in some moment in the future. That's the philosophy... |
| 17 Fevereiro 2008 12:21 |
| Ok
I think we should go for "I wish you to love me one day"
This is like casting a wish, if I have correctly understood now? So I think that I can validate with no problem as it stands?
Bises
Tantine
|
| 17 Fevereiro 2008 13:11 |
| |
| 17 Fevereiro 2008 14:57 |
| Hmmm..Both Siberia and RainnSaw seem to be native Russian speakers (and the latter is even an Expert in it), and their messages above seem to say that the meaning is
...for one day
as in, (even) for a single day.
They don't seem to agree with the
...someday
interpretation?
Or am I misunderstanding their messages above?
Hmmm... |
| 17 Fevereiro 2008 15:10 |
| Yes, it could be that, I mentioned it above. But it's not clear whether it is or not... |