| | |
| | 24 Tháng 10 2009 22:03 |
| iriniTổng số bài gửi: 849 | Hey there!
OK let's see:
a) Δίκαιον εστί = impersonal expression. It's subject would be in accusative, in this case, "τόν ευ Ï€Ïάττοντα".
Edit: That's what happens when you are not fully awake. What I meant to write of course was that its subject is the infinitive whose subject is of course in accusative. My apologies to all those who had to wince when they read the above!
b) Unless my memory fails me, "μιμνήσκω" goes with genitive so "θεοÏ" is right and is the verb's object.
c) While the dative "υμιν" does give us the subject of impersonal "εξεστιν", "Λακεδαιμονίοις" doesn't go with it. Instead, "Spartans" serves as an "object" (sorry, I don't remember the term in English) of "ευεÏγÎτας" which otherwise lacks one.
As for the last sentence, it's not so much a matter of syntax/grammar as of meaning.
"εκβαίνω" metaphorically (as, I think we all agree, is used here) means
"1. come out, turn out
2. to be fulfilled, of prophecies, etc.
3. go out of due bounds
4. project, extend beyond a limit
5. lapse
6. á¼ÎºÎ²Î±á½·Î½Î¿Î½Ï„ος μηνός, = φθίνοντος μ."
( source )
Having this in mind and the overall meaning, I think the Greek translation is more accurate.
|
| | 23 Tháng 10 2009 19:45 |
| | "μιμνήσκω" can be connected with genetive as well as accusative. In this case it is supposed to be connected with accusative, because of next words:τον ευ Ï€Ïαττοντα which are just in accusative... hm... I don't know if we can have mixed both gen and acc in one object... so θεου should be changed into θεον..
Îυν εξεστιν υμιν ευεÏγετας φανηναι Λακεδαιμονιοις
Sorry, but we just have to connect υμιν with Λακεδαιμονιοις, irini.
The sentence precisely is read: Now, to you- Spartans there is allowed to show benefactors.
Ου(κ) Ïαδιον εστι - negative! =It is not easy
κατα νουν - according to sb's will/mind |
| | 23 Tháng 10 2009 19:47 |
| | and μεμνησθαι is not from μιμνήσκω, but μιμνησκομαι
This is a verbum deponens and means "remember" or "remind oneself" (about sth) |
| | 23 Tháng 10 2009 20:15 |
| | |
| | 23 Tháng 10 2009 23:46 |
| | Hi
I'll try to help.
"Δίκαιον εστί" is an impersonal expression. Impersonal expressions take as their subject infitives without anticle (I don't know the exact term in English, in Greek it's "άναÏθÏο απαÏÎμφατο" . In this case it's "μεμνησθαι".
"μεμνησθαι θεου τον ευ Ï€Ïαττοντα":
"μεμνησθαι":infinitive
"θεου": object of infinitive (gen.)
"τον ευ Ï€Ïαττοντα" :subject of the infinitive. (when the subject of the verb and the subject of the infinitive without article aren't the same word, in Greek it's called ετεÏοπÏοσωπία, then the subject of the infinitive without article is in accusative).
"Îυν εξεστιν υμιν ευεÏγετας φανηναι Λακεδαιμονιοις"- the original is : "ὦ ἄνδÏες, νῦν ἔξεστιν ὑμῖν εá½ÎµÏγÎτας φανῆναι τῶν Λακεδαιμονίων" (meaning only, OK? : Oh men, now you can show yourselfs/be (as) benefactors of the Spartans, KSENOFON 4.8.4). Here we have "to the Spartans". "Î¥ou Spartans"= ὦ Λακεδαιμόνιοι"
I hope it helps a bit |
| | 24 Tháng 10 2009 00:31 |
| | "ευ Ï€Ïαττοντα" - I would translate it as "he who feels hapiness/the happy man" (according to Aristotle's "ΑδÏνατον τόν μηδÎν Ï€Ïάττοντα Ï€Ïάττειν εÏ"- He who does nothing cannot do well/feel hapiness.) |
| | 24 Tháng 10 2009 14:46 |
| | Yes, you helped, User10! Thank you.
Especially giving us some context of the second sentence.
I've made some corrections according to suggestions of you both, dear friends and according to my new ideas...
We can continue discussing if it is needed, of course... Good to know I can count on your help here. |
| | 24 Tháng 10 2009 22:01 |
| iriniTổng số bài gửi: 849 | Hello everyone! It's grumpy me again, the neighborhood curmudgeon
OK, I've edited the last sentence of the Greek translation that, on second thought, needed tweaking.
As for your edited translation:
a) "It is good" : Maybe "it is right/proper/just"? What do you think
b)Second sentence: I don't think "allowed" is "the" thing. Mind you, I am not saying it's wrong, but maybe "you have the opportunity"? Or "It is possible for you"? Also "to show benefactors to Spartans" needs some tweaking to work in English eh? How about (just a suggestion mind you) "it is possible for you to be seen/appear as benefactors of the Spartans" ?
c) Last sentence: I would personally translate it as "It is not easy for a mortal man to have everything happen according to his wishes" with a note explaining away the ambiguity of such a clumsy phrase by saying that it means that "it's rare for things to go as planned for a mortal"
BUT I'm open to suggestions |
| | 24 Tháng 10 2009 22:14 |
| | Wow!!! It was really helpful, dear irini! Thank you!
Yes, my English isn't perfect, so thank you for your suggestions!!! I will work on it in a moment. Would be glad if you check it after that... |
| | 24 Tháng 10 2009 22:20 |
| |
I've changed also God --> god
Thank you so much once again, great Greek experts!
Now, I think English expert can give his/her opinion...
|
| | 7 Tháng 11 2009 02:06 |
| | Taking into account all suggestions I've made some edits. Tell me what you think. |
| | 7 Tháng 11 2009 10:24 |
| | Yes, it makes sens. |
| | 7 Tháng 11 2009 14:00 |
| | we have the opportunity to show ourselves -->you have...yourselves... |
| | 7 Tháng 11 2009 15:24 |
| | I don't agree it should be "ourselves"
υμιν --> 2nd person plural (dative)= to you
I would change the sentence:
Now, you have the opportunity to show benefactors to the Spartans
"you have the opportunity" --> literally: There is an opportunity to you (εξεστιν υμιν)
|
| | 7 Tháng 11 2009 15:26 |
| | |
| | 7 Tháng 11 2009 15:41 |
| |
Yes you can be surprised, Lilly...
From the sentence we can't deduce that the benefactors are the people being the subject of the sentence... It was only our "default object"... so I decided to change the sentence once again... |
| | 7 Tháng 11 2009 15:35 |
| | though "φανηναι" has a medial voice and it can be translated: "appear/show oneself"
Hm... I would leave the version which is now... |