Tafsiri - Kituruki-Kiingereza - Ofisiniz ile ilgili istemiÅŸ olduÄŸunuz tadilatlar...

Nicely done, elifyo. A few small corrections:

requisitions --> requests
of all works --> for all work
performed --> set
included to --> included in

elifyo, are you there?

Hello Kafetzou,
I was away for a few days, so I just saw your message.
I agree with "requests","for all works" and "set". They fit better. But in my opinion "included in" is the right prepositional phrase. We shall not cahnge it.

"included in" is correct. You had written "included to" originally. But why haven't you made the changes you said you would make? It's not about fitting better - it's about being correct in English!

I've already written "included in" originally. You should look carefaully before insisting on something and accusing someone.

I really did not have time to do the changes. Also I thought this was a volunteer work. So why should I avoid doing a work that I am voluntarily doing.

I was not informed about having a perfect Englih was a "must" for making translations here while I was joining in. So with my English knowledge using "requisition" or "performed" is not wrong, but "requests" or "set" are better.

I've made the changes as you wanted. But I am really disappointed about your style.

Have a nice day

Hi elifyo

I think we have a misunderstanding here. I'm a volunteer too, and I'm an expert for English. My duty here is to make sure the English is correct before I validate your translation. It's not about being perfect; it's about being correct.

When I first wrote underneath your translation, I praised your translation and gave you the four small corrections that needed to be made (for grammatical reasons).

Then you didn't respond for about a week, so I asked where you were. In the meantime, Francky had already made one of the corrections (included in) - I'm not sure why.

Then you wrote and said you agreed, but you did not make the changes, which is what I was expecting you to do (maybe I should have said that). And you wrote as if I was asking you to change "included in" to "included to" for some reason.

Then I wrote and reminded you to make the corrections, which you have now done, so I can validate the translation. I don't understand why you're angry with me.

Hi,

I thought you were angry with me and accusing me for being late and I also knew that I've originally written "included in" and thought you wanted me to change it to "included to". So I waited for your answer and did not make the corrections. I should have done the other corrections of course. I work hard nowadays. Also this is a writing area and apparently I misunderstood you.

Sorry for my style.

Best regards

No problem.