Cucumis - Kostenloser Online-Übersetzungsdienst
. .



Übersetzung - Türkisch-Englisch - MAYIN TEMÄ°ZLEME

momentaner StatusÜbersetzung
Dieser Text ist in den folgenden Sprachen erhältlich: TürkischEnglisch

Kategorie Zeitungen - Gesellschaft / Leute / Politik

Titel
MAYIN TEMÄ°ZLEME
Text
Übermittelt von Bernando
Herkunftssprache: Türkisch

MAYIN TEMİZLEME İŞİNDEN PİS KOKU ÇIKTI İHALE İPTAL EDİLDİ

İHALE ORTASINDA ŞARTNAME DEĞİŞTİ

İPTAL EDİLEN ŞARTNAMEDE İHALE KANUNA AYKIRI DEĞİŞİKLİK

VALÄ°LÄ°K KENDÄ°NÄ° SAVUNDU

İHALEYİ VERENLE KATILAN AKRABA ÇIKTI
Bemerkungen zur Übersetzung
This is headlines taken from an article. Since the article is rather long, I thought it could be a good idea to just translate the headlines first, in order to be able to chose what parts of the article to transle afterwards.

Titel
SOMETHING ROTTEN WITH MINE CLEAN-UP JOB
Übersetzung
Englisch

Übersetzt von kafetzou
Zielsprache: Englisch

SOMETHING ROTTEN WITH MINE CLEAN-UP JOB. BID RETRACTED

SPECS CHANGED IN MID-BID

IN CANCELLED ONE, CHANGE IN SPECS AGAINST BID LAW

GOVERNOR'S OFFICE DEFENDS ITSELF

BID TENDERER AND PARTICIPANT TURN OUT TO BE RELATIVES
Bemerkungen zur Übersetzung
I used headline style as the requester said these were headlines.

I've changed the third one according to the information in the actual article. I believe that "KANUNA" is a typo and should be "KANUNUNA".

Thanks, smy, for your help with "mayın".
Zuletzt bestätigt oder bearbeitet von kafetzou - 23 Februar 2008 23:14





Letzte Beiträge

Autor
Beitrag

23 Februar 2008 11:17

smy
Anzahl der Beiträge: 2481
3rd line is not correctly translated, it means:
"illegal changes in cancelled specs"

and "akraba çıkmak" is a statement meaning "turn out to be relatives" so
İHALEYİ VERENLE KATILAN AKRABA ÇIKTI = IT TURNED OUT THAT BID TENDERER AND PARTICIPATOR ARE RELATIVES

CC: kafetzou

23 Februar 2008 16:04

kafetzou
Anzahl der Beiträge: 7963
Thanks about "akraba çıkmak", smy - I didn't know that!

But I don't understand how the 3rd line could be "illegal changes in cancelled specs" - could you explain? Here's how I understood it:

Ä°PTAL EDÄ°LEN ÅžARTNAMEDE = IN CANCELLED SPECS

Ä°HALE KANUNA AYKIRI = THE BID IS AGAINST THE LAW

DEĞİŞİKLİK = CHANGE

23 Februar 2008 16:45

smy
Anzahl der Beiträge: 2481
Ä°HALE KANUNA! sorry, I haven't noticed the typo , it's "ihale kanununa"

23 Februar 2008 16:56

kafetzou
Anzahl der Beiträge: 7963
But that's not what it says - the requester clearly copied these headlines directly from the sources. Is there another possible interpretation?

23 Februar 2008 16:59

smy
Anzahl der Beiträge: 2481
Well, "Ä°HALE KANUNA" is meaningless ,

Bernando could check your source again and edit tell us if you had copied the 3rd line correctly?

23 Februar 2008 17:03

kafetzou
Anzahl der Beiträge: 7963
I'm sorry to be so slow to understand, but doesn't "Ä°HALE KANUNA AYKIRI" mean "the bid is against the law?"

23 Februar 2008 17:14

smy
Anzahl der Beiträge: 2481
yes, that's true, "Ä°HALE KANUNA AYKIRI" means "the bid is against the law" but
when we put "Değişiklik" at the end of the sentence, it's impossible to mean anything other than "ihale kanununa aykırı değişiklik"

CC: kafetzou

23 Februar 2008 17:54

kafetzou
Anzahl der Beiträge: 7963
OK - I've made the change, but I still don't understand that sentence - it was the bid that was cancelled, not the specifications, right?

23 Februar 2008 17:59

smy
Anzahl der Beiträge: 2481
Yes, that's what the first line says but 3rd line says "iptal edilen ÅŸartnamede" which means the specifications was (also ?) cancelled

23 Februar 2008 18:01

smy
Anzahl der Beiträge: 2481
ok, here I found the whole article , it seems the specifications was changed and also was cancelled before the bid

CC: kafetzou

23 Februar 2008 18:15

smy
Anzahl der Beiträge: 2481
but now the source is correct, it's "Ä°HALE KANUNA", then "ihale" maybe the object of the sentence that --> "IN CANCELLED SPECS THE BID IS THE CHANGE THAT IS ILLEGAL"

CC: kafetzou

23 Februar 2008 21:01

Bernando
Anzahl der Beiträge: 25
Hey smy and kafetzou,

I've checked the source again, and it does say "kanuna".

http://www.spothaber.com/haber.asp?id=72529

But as I understand from your conversation, kanuna vs kanununas only has to do with grammar? Or have I misinterpreted you?

23 Februar 2008 21:21

smy
Anzahl der Beiträge: 2481
yes Bernando, it says "kanuna" (I've found the original source ) but it's a bit complicated that it may mean both things:

1. IN CANCELLED SPECS CHANGE RUNS COUNTER TO BID LAW (I think this is the correct translation)

or

2. IN CANCELLED SPECS THE BID IS THE CHANGE THAT IS ILLEGAL (this is the questionable meaning )

23 Februar 2008 23:11

kafetzou
Anzahl der Beiträge: 7963
My God this one is difficult! I guess this is the key part:

Söz konusu değişiklik ihaleden 4 gün önce firmalara bildirildi. Ancak değişiklik zaten iptal edilen ihale şartnamesi üzerinde yapılmıştı. İtirazcı firma şartnamenin ihaleden 4 gün önce değiştirildiğini, üstelik iptal edilenin değiştirildiğini ortaya çıkardı.

The issue is that the change was announced to the companies 4 days before the bid(s). However, the change was made to the bid specifications that were already to be retracted. The objecting company revealed that the specifications had been changed 4 days before, and furthermore that the one that was to be retracted had been changed.

23 Februar 2008 23:15

kafetzou
Anzahl der Beiträge: 7963
I've changed it again.

23 Februar 2008 23:15

kafetzou
Anzahl der Beiträge: 7963
Bernando, the grammar makes all the difference here in terms of meaning.

24 Februar 2008 00:13

Bernando
Anzahl der Beiträge: 25
Haha, yeah, I noticed that you had already found it smy. =)

But kafetzou, I got a bit confused by "the change was made to the bid specifications that were already to be retracted"? Does it actually say that in the part of the article that you pasted? Sounds very wierd. So they had first decided to retract the specifications, and then later on they changed the specifications?

Or should I interpret it as: they changed the specifications during the bidding round (by accepting late tenders), which is illegal, and therefore they had to retract (and re-do) the whole bidding round?

24 Februar 2008 00:44

kafetzou
Anzahl der Beiträge: 7963
Bernando, I translated the section I excerpted above - you can see the translation right below it.

My interpretation is that they changed the specifications after it had already been decided that the first bid was going to be retracted, and that the way they changed the specifications might have affected whether or not the bid was retracted, but it was too late, so that was illegal (I guess).

24 Februar 2008 01:04

Bernando
Anzahl der Beiträge: 25
Alright. It's just that the order of events seems a bit strange to me. Why change the specifications if they had already decided to retract the round??? Strange... However, retracting the round due to a (illegal) change in specifications would make sense. Anyhow, I'm going to have the rest of the article translated as well, maybe it will be clearer then.

Thanks!

24 Februar 2008 02:25

kafetzou
Anzahl der Beiträge: 7963
OK - I did the best I could. Let's see what another translator can do with the whole article.
Weiterlesen