Traduction - Français-Anglais - slm sana cevap yazmak istemiyordum

Etat courant ‎Traduction

Ce texte est disponible dans les langues suivantes:

Catégorie Language familier

Titre

slm sana cevap yazmak istemiyordum

Texte
Proposé par

ozan_1881

Langue de départ: Français Traduit par aysunca

Salut, je ne voulais pas t'Ã©crire de rÃ©ponse, je voulais te parler en face Ã face Ã ton arrivÃ©e. Je te comprends, je suis fautif mais ils ont tellement grossi les choses que rien n'est comme tu le penses. Tu ne m'as pas laissÃ© seul avec moi-mÃªme, je te l'ai tellement demandÃ©. Tu Ã©tais trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi, je t'ai beaucoup aimÃ©e, mais c'est d'abord toi qui a fini aussi cet amour, je sais trÃ¨s bien quelle est mon erreur et je la reconnais. Quoi que tu penses sur moi tu es toujours trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi.

Titre	I didn't want to reply to you in writing, ...
Traduction Anglais Traduit par jollyo	Langue d'arrivée: Anglais I didn't want to reply to you in writing, I wanted to talk to you face to face at your arrival. I understand you, I am wrong, but they have extensively magnified things, and nothing is as you think. You have not left me to myself, I've requested you this explicitely. You were very special to me, I have loved you very much, but it was you in the first place who has also ended this love. I know very well what my mistake is and I recognize that. Whatever you think of me, you are still very special to me.
Commentaires pour la traduction	The parenthetic words are optional. They might add to the intent of the text. Jollyo

Dernière édition ou validation par lilian canale

- 10 Septembre 2008 16:19

Derniers messages

	Auteur	Message
		2 Septembre 2008 03:46
	lilian canale Nombre de messages: 14972	Hi jollyo, I have two changes to make; "I know very well what my mistake is" "Whatever you think of me, you are still very special to me." I'd also use "that" instead of "this" What do you think?
		2 Septembre 2008 04:05
	jollyo Nombre de messages: 330	The only thing I do not follow is your suggestion of changing: you will always be ... into you are still ... tu es toujours: you are always... ?? Can you explain? The other two are good changes. Thank you. (the first one must have been a typo, 'cause I know this is the right sequence...) So far adapted.
		2 Septembre 2008 04:43
	lilian canale Nombre de messages: 14972	"toujours" may have several meanings, it's not always "always". It may be 'still', 'yet', 'never cease', etc And I think in this text what it means is "still". That's what makes sense, don't you think? Read the whole text again and tell me if it doesn't sound better.
		2 Septembre 2008 05:50
	turkishmiss Nombre de messages: 2132	I agree with Lilian the last sentence is : tu es toujours (encore) trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi. you are still very special to me. In French the meaning of "you will always be very special to me." is "tu seras toujours trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi"
		2 Septembre 2008 12:00
	jollyo Nombre de messages: 330	Hi Turkishmiss, I am aware that the future tense in the last sentence is not actually written in French. In English future tense is used more often than in French, whenever there is something mentioned that points to the future. Anyway... Lilian, I think both translations work: 'you will always be very special' has to me the intention to say that whatever happened, or whatever you think of me, whatever choice we make 'you will always be etc. If you still feel it should be 'you are still very special...' it's okay with me. Tell me what your opinion is Lilian and I will edit if needed.
		2 Septembre 2008 12:13
	guilon Nombre de messages: 1549	Jollyo, I also think "toujours" means "still" in this text. "Toujours" is a synonym for "encore" and I think Miss explained very well why it couldn't be "always" or "forever"
		8 Septembre 2008 22:44
	Shaneeae Nombre de messages: 55	I've requested you this explicitely. => I've asked you this explicitly.
		8 Septembre 2008 23:09
	gamine Nombre de messages: 4611	Only one sentence . they have extensively magnified"===>they have amplified so much, but I can be wrong!!
		9 Septembre 2008 02:24
	Shaneeae Nombre de messages: 55	I would say it this way: I am wrong, but they have extensively magnified things, and nothing is as you think. ==> I am at fault, but they have exaggerated so much that nothing is as you think.