| | |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 17日 18:25 |
| Bamsaचिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 1524 | I would like to make some observations:
"av den" means "by the one" and not "by those", Can not be translated by plural, because "den" reffers to the singular. Than it should has been "de" in the Sweedish text.
ecclesiastical means, according to Oxford dictionary, "relating to the Christian Church or its clergy" or Romans were not Christian, so, in my opinion, the word is incorrectly used. More correct would be "relligious official position".
Than "erhöll" means "to receive" or "to get" and it has been translated by "had", which is, again, not 100% correct.
CC: pias |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 17日 18:28 |
| | "By the one" or "by those" have the same effect here.
I'm trying not to make literal translations.
This is a tax from the XV century, not from antient Rome.
Kyrka = church.
CC: Bamsa |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 17日 18:31 |
| Bamsaचिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 1524 | OK, my mistake there, the original text did write "Roman", this creates confusions. What about "erhøll"?
kyrkligt = relligious and, by the way, we have almost the same word in Faroese. |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 17日 18:43 |
| | Wow. That was my HUGE mistake.
Thank you for pointing me this one (erhöll), Bamsa.
And yes, you are right about kyrkligt=religius, but you can see that it's an adjective for "church", like "churchy". |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 17日 18:47 |
| piasचिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 8113 | Casper,
1. Bamsa is right, this IS singular , den = "by the one..."
2. About the meaning of ecclesiastical.. I think he is right about it and maybe you should use a more neutral word for "kyrkligt ämbete", religious official position or church's official position.
3. This is not about tax, just a charge or a fee.
|
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 17日 18:49 |
| | Ok, ok, I will change 6 for six. |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 17日 19:29 |
| piasचिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 8113 | Casper,
according to (the best dictionary!!)wiki "kyrkligt ämbete"
is the same as Patriark = Patriarch
maybe you could use that word...
|
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 21日 23:58 |
| | NO Pia. There it's like an explanation, like
Patriark (kyrkligt ämbete)
Elephant (animal)
Because there can be more than one arcticle with the same name.
Patriarch can't be applied here.
Anyway, thank you. |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 17日 19:56 |
| piasचिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 8113 | yes..you are right...
after many hours today in front of the computer, my brain is not 'with me' |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 17日 19:58 |
| | Yeah.
I know what is it like. |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 19日 21:05 |
| | Hola otra vez, estoy leyendo la argumentación que tuviste con Pias y Bamsa sobre mi texto, y me encantarÃa saber, en español, de qué se trató. ¿A qué conclusión llegaron?. ¿La Curia Romana es la iglesia romana?. ¿El pago es un impuesto?. ¿Quién le paga a quién, la curia al que va a trabajar en la iglesia o el que trabaja en la iglesia a la curia?. Por favor, aclara mis dudas. |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 19日 21:15 |
| piasचिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 8113 | Hi gabyvirtual,
please write in english..
I don't understand. |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 21日 14:04 |
| | Hi Pias, excuse me but my english is so bad, i have friends that help me to understand it, that is the reason (¿?) because i said that i understand english. Excuse me if you do not understand my english or my spanish |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 21日 14:10 |
| | But that is not a problem to me understand you sometimes, some words. (again excuse my english)
|
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 21日 14:16 |
| piasचिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 8113 | It's ok gabyvirtual
and beside, I don't understand Spanish..
I was just curious about what you wrote, if you thought that something in the translation was wrong or similar. |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 21日 14:38 |
| | sorry, but your english is over me (¿?). I need somebody read it for me |
| | 2007年 डिसेम्बर 21日 14:46 |
| piasचिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 8113 | Hi guilon or Lila F.
Please could some of you bridge the message sent
21 December 2007 14:16 to Spanish.
gabyvirtual don't understand what I try to say...
..some points for your help!
CC: guilon Lila F. |