Translation - Frans-Engels - slm sana cevap yazmak istemiyordum

Current status ‎Translation

This text is available in the following languages:

Category Colloquial

Title

slm sana cevap yazmak istemiyordum

Text
Submitted by

ozan_1881

Source language: Frans Translated by aysunca

Salut, je ne voulais pas t'Ã©crire de rÃ©ponse, je voulais te parler en face Ã face Ã ton arrivÃ©e. Je te comprends, je suis fautif mais ils ont tellement grossi les choses que rien n'est comme tu le penses. Tu ne m'as pas laissÃ© seul avec moi-mÃªme, je te l'ai tellement demandÃ©. Tu Ã©tais trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi, je t'ai beaucoup aimÃ©e, mais c'est d'abord toi qui a fini aussi cet amour, je sais trÃ¨s bien quelle est mon erreur et je la reconnais. Quoi que tu penses sur moi tu es toujours trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi.

Title	I didn't want to reply to you in writing, ...
Translation Engels Translated by jollyo	Target language: Engels I didn't want to reply to you in writing, I wanted to talk to you face to face at your arrival. I understand you, I am wrong, but they have extensively magnified things, and nothing is as you think. You have not left me to myself, I've requested you this explicitely. You were very special to me, I have loved you very much, but it was you in the first place who has also ended this love. I know very well what my mistake is and I recognize that. Whatever you think of me, you are still very special to me.
Remarks about the translation	The parenthetic words are optional. They might add to the intent of the text. Jollyo

Laaste geakkrediteerde redigering deur lilian canale

- 10 September 2008 16:19

Last messages

	Author	Message
		2 September 2008 03:46
	lilian canale Number of messages: 14972	Hi jollyo, I have two changes to make; "I know very well what my mistake is" "Whatever you think of me, you are still very special to me." I'd also use "that" instead of "this" What do you think?
		2 September 2008 04:05
	jollyo Number of messages: 330	The only thing I do not follow is your suggestion of changing: you will always be ... into you are still ... tu es toujours: you are always... ?? Can you explain? The other two are good changes. Thank you. (the first one must have been a typo, 'cause I know this is the right sequence...) So far adapted.
		2 September 2008 04:43
	lilian canale Number of messages: 14972	"toujours" may have several meanings, it's not always "always". It may be 'still', 'yet', 'never cease', etc And I think in this text what it means is "still". That's what makes sense, don't you think? Read the whole text again and tell me if it doesn't sound better.
		2 September 2008 05:50
	turkishmiss Number of messages: 2132	I agree with Lilian the last sentence is : tu es toujours (encore) trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi. you are still very special to me. In French the meaning of "you will always be very special to me." is "tu seras toujours trÃ¨s spÃ©ciale pour moi"
		2 September 2008 12:00
	jollyo Number of messages: 330	Hi Turkishmiss, I am aware that the future tense in the last sentence is not actually written in French. In English future tense is used more often than in French, whenever there is something mentioned that points to the future. Anyway... Lilian, I think both translations work: 'you will always be very special' has to me the intention to say that whatever happened, or whatever you think of me, whatever choice we make 'you will always be etc. If you still feel it should be 'you are still very special...' it's okay with me. Tell me what your opinion is Lilian and I will edit if needed.
		2 September 2008 12:13
	guilon Number of messages: 1549	Jollyo, I also think "toujours" means "still" in this text. "Toujours" is a synonym for "encore" and I think Miss explained very well why it couldn't be "always" or "forever"
		8 September 2008 22:44
	Shaneeae Number of messages: 55	I've requested you this explicitely. => I've asked you this explicitly.
		8 September 2008 23:09
	gamine Number of messages: 4611	Only one sentence . they have extensively magnified"===>they have amplified so much, but I can be wrong!!
		9 September 2008 02:24
	Shaneeae Number of messages: 55	I would say it this way: I am wrong, but they have extensively magnified things, and nothing is as you think. ==> I am at fault, but they have exaggerated so much that nothing is as you think.