Cucumis - Ókeypis álinju umsetingar tænasta
. .



Umseting - Danskt-Italskt - Lær mig at kende, og se, hvem jeg er (: ...

Núverðandi støðaUmseting
Hesin teksturin er tøkur í fylgjandi málum: DansktPortugisiskt brasilisktItalsktLatín

Heiti
Lær mig at kende, og se, hvem jeg er (: ...
Tekstur
Framborið av Himmelhunden
Uppruna mál: Danskt

Lær mig at kende, og se, hvem jeg er (:
Er ikke en skuespiller, men en person i virkelighedens spillefilm blandt andre..
Viðmerking um umsetingina
Bridge by Bamsa:
"Learn to know me and see who I am.
I am not an actor, but a person in the real life movie, among others."

Heiti
Impara a conoscermi e guarda chi sono.
Umseting
Italskt

Umsett av alexfatt
Ynskt mál: Italskt

Impara a conoscermi e guarda chi sono (:
Non sono un attore, ma una persona nel film della vita reale, fra gli altri.
Góðkent av alexfatt - 16 Januar 2012 17:23





Síðstu boð

Høvundur
Eini boð

13 Januar 2012 18:46

lilian canale
Tal av boðum: 14972
vedrai ---> vedi

13 Januar 2012 18:54

alexfatt
Tal av boðum: 1538
"Vedrai chi sono" is a set phrase. Using an imperative is correct but, you know, unusual.

13 Januar 2012 21:04

lilian canale
Tal av boðum: 14972
But IMO, the future tense implies a condition.
"(If you) learn to know me you'll see who I am"

I think the original (as it was bridged) means:
"Learn to know me (and) see who I am" (do both things - one does not depend on the other)

13 Januar 2012 22:28

alexfatt
Tal av boðum: 1538
Thanks for your comments Lilian, but I'm afraid I don't understand.

"Learn to know me" and "See who I am" are not related? Logically I can't imagine doing both things without them being related. Of course, only after learning to know someone you see who (s)he is. "See who I am" happens necessarily after, in my humble opinion. That's why the set phrase appears mostly at the future tense in Italian. It's often placed after imperatives, i.e. "Lascialo fare e vedrai chi è" - "Dagli gli strumenti e vedrai che farà" etc.

I mean, it barely makes sense to me to consider the two actions happening at the same time and not related.
I hope not to spend too much time on a simple issue.


13 Januar 2012 23:51

lilian canale
Tal av boðum: 14972
I know what you mean. Your version sounds more "familiar", but as I said, according to Bamsa's bridge the verb tense should be imperative.
Anyway... even if I agree with you that this does not deserve too much discussion, I'd like Bamsa's input about the exact meaning in the original and if the future tense could be acceptable as well, ok?

@ Ernst? What do you say?

CC: Bamsa

15 Januar 2012 21:59

Bamsa
Tal av boðum: 1524
Hi
"Lær" is imperative.
If it was future, there should be an auxiliary verb + the infinitive of the verb.

15 Januar 2012 22:07

alexfatt
Tal av boðum: 1538
Ok. To avoid the resulting oddity, I'll just use a different verb.

Thanks a lot Ernst and Lilian