Tradução - Sueco-Inglês - Vore tacksam för översättning frÃ¥n sve-eng

Hello girls. I must admit that I found the Swedish tex a bit strange, but as I said , I wanted to give it a try. Not sure that when she's about"storvuxna bebis" she talks about herself. Agtee with Pia thta tttthe "missing word could be "independent". But Lilian, if my English is very bad just reject it. You're the expert and moreover you understand Swedish. IF the missing words will be added, I'd like to have one more try, and if it's bad, I'll stop editing in English. What do you think.

CC: lilian canale

Hi Gamine,

Let's wait a little to see if the requestor can clarify what is missing.
After Pia and Lenab have decided what will be the final text you will be asked to adapt your translation, OK?

Don't worry. There is no need for a rejection.

Thanks Lilian. Very kind of you, but I dont want you to waste time. You know, that I'm not used to translate to English.

I've sent Efsson a pm today ...even if she has this one on "notification".

Then...what are we going to do with this request?

Hi lilian. I was asking myself the same question, but I can't decide. I think that lenab's version is not that bad and we could use it if the requester doesn't answer.

CC: lilian canale

I agree with Lenas version, but I do think the last world would be "oberoende" instead of "krävande". Can't one translate it as it is ...and then put Lenas suggest in the notes, as an alternative?

Hej Pia; Could you decide with Lilian. You are both experts. I have to log out for a moment. Must do some shopping. Will be back later today.

CC: lilian canale

Well girls, what do you think of this :

When we get an infant we instinctively know how to take care of it, he doesn't, as well as he doesnt have the required information enabling him to take care of this "big baby". An infant is neither psychological nor physical independent which make it easier to foster it.

CC: lilian canale

The requester seems to be far away from her computer

Lene .. I think that you have interpret the text GOOD I'm not the English expert, but the meaning seems perfect to me now.

Two small things ..maybe "infant" should be changed to "child" and since the word "independent" is the missing word ...maybe you shall exclude it and mention it as a possible word in the notes instead. ???

Hej Pia. I'll do the changes you suggested and then we can see what Lilian thinks about it. Tack, snälla

Ooops Lene, du kanske skulle ha väntat till Lena och Lilian sagt sitt också ?? Det var bara min åsikt.

Lilian, Lena ..

Är det ok?

CC: lilian canale

I'd put it this way:

"When we have a child, we instinctively know how to take care of it, he doesn't, as he doesn't have the required information enabling him to take care of this "big baby" either. A child is neither psychological nor physical (...) which makes it easier to foster it."

Hi Lilian. Yes it sounds much better this way. Will correct at once. Thanks.

Hi Gamine, you forgot to remove that "as well as" and you didn't insert (...) either.

I agree with Lilian, but I still wonder who "he" is.

Hi girls. Have corrected according to Lilian's suggestion. What do you think now?

CC: lilian canale

OK Gamine, I've set a poll, so please, no more edition.

Ok. Lilian. Thanks for your help.

CC: lilian canale