| |
|
Traduction - Anglais-Russe - There was a contention as far as a suitEtat courant Traduction
Ce texte est disponible dans les langues suivantes:
Catégorie Littérature - Culture | There was a contention as far as a suit | | Langue de départ: Anglais
There was a contention as far as a suit, which of the religious orders should ring to prayers first in the morning; and it was determined, that they should ring first that rose earliest. |
|
| До разбирательÑтва ÑущеÑтвовало разноглаÑие | | Langue d'arrivée: Russe
До разбирательÑтва ÑущеÑтвовало разноглаÑие, какой из духовных орденов должен первым звонить молÑщимÑÑ ÑƒÑ‚Ñ€Ð¾Ð¼; и было определено, что Ñледует звонить раньше, чем вÑтают Ñамые ранние молÑщиеÑÑ. |
|
Dernière édition ou validation par ramarren - 2 Février 2007 06:32
Derniers messages | | | | | 3 Février 2007 07:19 | | appleNombre de messages: 972 | How could it be? A text submitted (in a very strange English), translated (high quality!!!) and validated by the same person!
Actually, only the person who wrote that could understand what it meant!!! | | | 5 Février 2007 05:29 | | | Well, the answer is not simple, but I shall try to explain The translation was made by user "grenadine", but she is not expert, and that's why she sent me the translation with personal message. I found it's quality quite acceptable and just placed her variant where it should be and gave to grenadine the points which she deserved The main trick is that oficially all was made by myself, because I am an expert and grenadine is not. But I think that generally all is quite fair | | | 5 Février 2007 07:21 | | appleNombre de messages: 972 | The problem is not the Russian text, which I would not dare evaluate, of course; the problem is the English text, which being a very weird English, is quite difficult, if not impossible, to understand. How could you, or grenadine, understand what it means? | | | 5 Février 2007 07:52 | | | Well, I do not know, may be it would be better to ask this question to grenadine? Eventually, it is she, who appeared able to understand and translate it I tried also, but my translation appeared wrong, I misundersood it By the way, the text is of an author from 17th century =))))) | | | 5 Février 2007 08:35 | | appleNombre de messages: 972 | OK, I can understand it now. You should have written that is a XVII century text! Thank you, Ramarren. |
|
| |
|