Cucumis - निशुल्क अन्-लाइन अनुबाद सेवा
. .



अनुबाद - तुर्केली-अंग्रेजी - Sidqi

अहिलेको अवस्थाअनुबाद
यो हरफ निम्न भाषामा उपलब्ध छ: तुर्केलीअंग्रेजीफ्रान्सेली

Category Literature - Science

शीर्षक
Sidqi
हरफ
ABDELJAOUADद्वारा बुझाइएको
स्रोत भाषा: तुर्केली

Dîvânindan başka içinde üç dilde olmak üzere manzüm ve mensür lugaz ve muammalar ihtivâ eden Mecmû-i Hafîza isminde diğer bir eseri bulunmaktadir. Ayni zamanda değerli bir hattat olan Sidki; sülüs ve nesih yazilarini Ressam Ömer Efendi’den meşk etmiştir. Bursali Tâhir Bey Veziriâzam Ahmed Paşa’ya sundugu arazi’ ôlçûmûne dâir bir eserinden sözetmektedir.

शीर्षक
Sidqi, continued
अनुबाद
अंग्रेजी

kafetzouद्वारा अनुबाद गरिएको
अनुबाद गर्नुपर्ने भाषा: अंग्रेजी

There is another work found called Mecmû-i Hafîza (Memory Collection), which also includes puzzles and riddles in verse and in proze, in Diwani script and three other languages. The Thuluth and Naskh calligraphic scripts of Sidqi, who was at the same time a valued calligrapher, were used as models by the painter Ömer Efendi. Mention is made of a work of his including a land measurement presented to Ahmed Pasha, the Grand Vizier Tahir Bey of Bursa.
Validated by samanthalee - 2007年 अप्रिल 16日 01:35





पछिल्ला सन्देशहरु

लेखक
सन्देश

2007年 अप्रिल 15日 02:17

samanthalee
चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 235
Will it flow better if we use parenthesis here instead of commas?

The Thuluth and Naskh calligraphic scripts of Sidqi (at the same time a valued calligrapher) were used as models by the painter Ömer Efendi.

2007年 अप्रिल 15日 02:20

kafetzou
चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 7963
Why would that flow better? The parenthesis serves the same purpose as the appositive set off by commas, but it implies that the information is unnecessary, which is not indicated in the Turkish original.

2007年 अप्रिल 16日 01:13

samanthalee
चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 235
I don't quite agree with the view that things in parenthesis are unnecessary. If they are unnecessary, they shouldn't be written at all.

My concern here is that the subject matter is "the scripts", every part of the sentence should be refering to "the scripts". "Sidqi" is the subject detail; details of the subject detail shouldn't form part of the sentence.

2007年 अप्रिल 16日 01:17

kafetzou
चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 7963
Hmm. I never heard that grammar rule before, but I think I have a way to fix it so it will read better: Check it out.

2007年 अप्रिल 16日 01:34

samanthalee
चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 235
Opps, you are right. That's the grammer rule for Chinese. Sorry, when I find something doesn't read well and tries to pin-point the reason, the grammer rules for both my native languages start mixing up.

Adding "who was" really helps.

2007年 अप्रिल 16日 13:26

kafetzou
चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 7963
Great - glad we got that worked out.

2007年 अप्रिल 19日 14:03

serba
चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 655
And I don't understand this. Samanthalee doesn't know Turkish but she approves what kafetzou translates from Turkish into English .Please correct if I am wrong.I am puzzled...

2007年 अप्रिल 19日 14:19

pirulito
चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 1180
Oops! All the evidence points to it!

2007年 अप्रिल 19日 16:25

kafetzou
चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 7963
I don't understand pirulito's message above, but this is how the system works:

The experts are experts for their target language (usually their mother tongue) and they can approve translations from any language into that language. Usually, if we have no other information, we ask other translators to help with evaluation if we don't know the source language, and after we get enough positive feedback from other translators, we validate the translation.

Do you think there's a problem with this translation? It was a difficult one, as the Turkish is very old (probably transliterated Ottoman Turkish), so it's possible I misinterpreted something. Your feedback would be welcome.