Cucumis - Безплатни онлайн преводачески услуги
. .



Превод - Турски-Английски - Sidqi

Текущо състояниеПревод
Този текст го има и на следните езици: ТурскиАнглийскиФренски

Категория Литература - Наука

Заглавие
Sidqi
Текст
Предоставено от ABDELJAOUAD
Език, от който се превежда: Турски

Dîvânindan başka içinde üç dilde olmak üzere manzüm ve mensür lugaz ve muammalar ihtivâ eden Mecmû-i Hafîza isminde diğer bir eseri bulunmaktadir. Ayni zamanda değerli bir hattat olan Sidki; sülüs ve nesih yazilarini Ressam Ömer Efendi’den meşk etmiştir. Bursali Tâhir Bey Veziriâzam Ahmed Paşa’ya sundugu arazi’ ôlçûmûne dâir bir eserinden sözetmektedir.

Заглавие
Sidqi, continued
Превод
Английски

Преведено от kafetzou
Желан език: Английски

There is another work found called Mecmû-i Hafîza (Memory Collection), which also includes puzzles and riddles in verse and in proze, in Diwani script and three other languages. The Thuluth and Naskh calligraphic scripts of Sidqi, who was at the same time a valued calligrapher, were used as models by the painter Ömer Efendi. Mention is made of a work of his including a land measurement presented to Ahmed Pasha, the Grand Vizier Tahir Bey of Bursa.
За последен път се одобри от samanthalee - 16 Април 2007 01:35





Последно мнение

Автор
Мнение

15 Април 2007 02:17

samanthalee
Общо мнения: 235
Will it flow better if we use parenthesis here instead of commas?

The Thuluth and Naskh calligraphic scripts of Sidqi (at the same time a valued calligrapher) were used as models by the painter Ömer Efendi.

15 Април 2007 02:20

kafetzou
Общо мнения: 7963
Why would that flow better? The parenthesis serves the same purpose as the appositive set off by commas, but it implies that the information is unnecessary, which is not indicated in the Turkish original.

16 Април 2007 01:13

samanthalee
Общо мнения: 235
I don't quite agree with the view that things in parenthesis are unnecessary. If they are unnecessary, they shouldn't be written at all.

My concern here is that the subject matter is "the scripts", every part of the sentence should be refering to "the scripts". "Sidqi" is the subject detail; details of the subject detail shouldn't form part of the sentence.

16 Април 2007 01:17

kafetzou
Общо мнения: 7963
Hmm. I never heard that grammar rule before, but I think I have a way to fix it so it will read better: Check it out.

16 Април 2007 01:34

samanthalee
Общо мнения: 235
Opps, you are right. That's the grammer rule for Chinese. Sorry, when I find something doesn't read well and tries to pin-point the reason, the grammer rules for both my native languages start mixing up.

Adding "who was" really helps.

16 Април 2007 13:26

kafetzou
Общо мнения: 7963
Great - glad we got that worked out.

19 Април 2007 14:03

serba
Общо мнения: 655
And I don't understand this. Samanthalee doesn't know Turkish but she approves what kafetzou translates from Turkish into English .Please correct if I am wrong.I am puzzled...

19 Април 2007 14:19

pirulito
Общо мнения: 1180
Oops! All the evidence points to it!

19 Април 2007 16:25

kafetzou
Общо мнения: 7963
I don't understand pirulito's message above, but this is how the system works:

The experts are experts for their target language (usually their mother tongue) and they can approve translations from any language into that language. Usually, if we have no other information, we ask other translators to help with evaluation if we don't know the source language, and after we get enough positive feedback from other translators, we validate the translation.

Do you think there's a problem with this translation? It was a difficult one, as the Turkish is very old (probably transliterated Ottoman Turkish), so it's possible I misinterpreted something. Your feedback would be welcome.