| | |
| | 13 July 2008 10:00 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | Hej Lilian,
Har redigerat din text enligt den färdigställda engelska, ok?
Före redigering:
Vi är änglar med en enda vinge,
och att kan flyga om vi är omfamnat.
|
| | 13 July 2008 17:42 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | Hm, du svarar inte ... då lägger jag ut den för en kort omröstning, så får vi se. |
| | 13 July 2008 17:46 |
| | Sorry for not answering in time, I was somehow busy
I don't think however, that in the original was necessary that "each of us" that's why I didn't translate it. |
| | 13 July 2008 17:58 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | Ok ...maybe you ARE right, I think that "Vi är änglar..." could be ok. too. I change that back and then lets see what the "crocodiles" think. |
| | 13 July 2008 18:37 |
| lenabNumber of messages: 1084 | "Vi är alla änglar"...kunde kanske vara en variant.
"med en enda vinge" , kunde kanske sägas "med bara en vinge". Vad tycker ni? |
| | 13 July 2008 19:20 |
| | det borde vara
Vi är var och en Änglar... |
| | 13 July 2008 19:28 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | Lilian,
det verkar som om du bör översätta "each of us", antingen tillbaka till "Vi är var och en Änglar..." så som också pollito86 anser, eller enligt lenabs förslag "Vi är alla änglar..".
Jag tycker personligen att "en enda vinge" funkar bra, men om du gillar lenabs förslag så kan du justera även det. |
| | 13 July 2008 19:32 |
| | The original is not in perfect English, we could improve it in many ways.
Of course, several variants could be used here, but I think the meaning is accurate the way it is.
I've done the Br. Portuguese version observing some "poetic licence" as well.
But it's up to you, Pia. I'm sure you'll find the best structure or reject it . Feel free to do so, OK?
You know I wouldn't mind at all. |
| | 13 July 2008 19:35 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | Hm ..ok, I like lenabs suggest about "alla", so my suggest is that you change to: "Vi är alla änglar med en enda vinge, och vi kan endast flyga omfamnandes varandra"
Ok for you? |
| | 13 July 2008 19:37 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | |
| | 13 July 2008 19:47 |
| | lenab's suggestion sounds fine to me.
I'll edit that.
About the rejection: since we are adopting the "Zero Tolerance" policy concerning the English translations I think it would be a good idea to extend the measure to other languages. You'd save a lot of time with long-lasting corrections like this. |
| | 13 July 2008 19:58 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | ok |
| | 13 July 2008 20:00 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | Please pirulito, motivate why you vote negative.
CC: pirulito |
| | 13 July 2008 20:26 |
| gamineNumber of messages: 4611 | Have voted for this translation because " we are each of us angels" isn't necessary and the Swedih thanslation is just ok , and no need to discuss the meaning of one word!!! |
| | 13 July 2008 20:34 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | Please pollito86, motivate why you vote against. CC: pollito86 |
| | 13 July 2008 21:24 |
| | For me it looks good now!
Vi är alla änglar med endast en vinge och bara genom att omfamna varand kan vi flyga.
|
| | 13 July 2008 21:40 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | pollito86 ...I didn't saw that you have already given your reason, sorry for my misstake. CC: pollito86 |
| | 14 July 2008 12:48 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | Tack samtliga för inlägg, nu godkänner jag den. |