| | |
| | 13 Julho 2008 10:00 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | Hej Lilian,
Har redigerat din text enligt den färdigställda engelska, ok?
Före redigering:
Vi är änglar med en enda vinge,
och att kan flyga om vi är omfamnat.
|
| | 13 Julho 2008 17:42 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | Hm, du svarar inte ... dÃ¥ lägger jag ut den för en kort omröstning, sÃ¥ fÃ¥r vi se. |
| | 13 Julho 2008 17:46 |
| | Sorry for not answering in time, I was somehow busy
I don't think however, that in the original was necessary that "each of us" that's why I didn't translate it. |
| | 13 Julho 2008 17:58 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | Ok ...maybe you ARE right, I think that "Vi är änglar..." could be ok. too. I change that back and then lets see what the "crocodiles" think. |
| | 13 Julho 2008 18:37 |
| lenabNúmero de mensagens: 1084 | "Vi är alla änglar"...kunde kanske vara en variant.
"med en enda vinge" , kunde kanske sägas "med bara en vinge". Vad tycker ni? |
| | 13 Julho 2008 19:20 |
| | det borde vara
Vi är var och en Änglar... |
| | 13 Julho 2008 19:28 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | Lilian,
det verkar som om du bör översätta "each of us", antingen tillbaka till "Vi är var och en Änglar..." så som också pollito86 anser, eller enligt lenabs förslag "Vi är alla änglar..".
Jag tycker personligen att "en enda vinge" funkar bra, men om du gillar lenabs förslag så kan du justera även det. |
| | 13 Julho 2008 19:32 |
| | The original is not in perfect English, we could improve it in many ways.
Of course, several variants could be used here, but I think the meaning is accurate the way it is.
I've done the Br. Portuguese version observing some "poetic licence" as well.
But it's up to you, Pia. I'm sure you'll find the best structure or reject it . Feel free to do so, OK?
You know I wouldn't mind at all. |
| | 13 Julho 2008 19:35 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | Hm ..ok, I like lenabs suggest about "alla", so my suggest is that you change to: "Vi är alla änglar med en enda vinge, och vi kan endast flyga omfamnandes varandra"
Ok for you? |
| | 13 Julho 2008 19:37 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | |
| | 13 Julho 2008 19:47 |
| | lenab's suggestion sounds fine to me.
I'll edit that.
About the rejection: since we are adopting the "Zero Tolerance" policy concerning the English translations I think it would be a good idea to extend the measure to other languages. You'd save a lot of time with long-lasting corrections like this. |
| | 13 Julho 2008 19:58 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | ok |
| | 13 Julho 2008 20:00 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | Please pirulito, motivate why you vote negative.
CC: pirulito |
| | 13 Julho 2008 20:26 |
| gamineNúmero de mensagens: 4611 | Have voted for this translation because " we are each of us angels" isn't necessary and the Swedih thanslation is just ok , and no need to discuss the meaning of one word!!! |
| | 13 Julho 2008 20:34 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | Please pollito86, motivate why you vote against. CC: pollito86 |
| | 13 Julho 2008 21:24 |
| | For me it looks good now!
Vi är alla änglar med endast en vinge och bara genom att omfamna varand kan vi flyga.
|
| | 13 Julho 2008 21:40 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | pollito86 ...I didn't saw that you have already given your reason, sorry for my misstake. CC: pollito86 |
| | 14 Julho 2008 12:48 |
| piasNúmero de mensagens: 8113 | Tack samtliga för inlägg, nu godkänner jag den. |