| | |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 10:00 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | Hej Lilian,
Har redigerat din text enligt den färdigställda engelska, ok?
Före redigering:
Vi är änglar med en enda vinge,
och att kan flyga om vi är omfamnat.
|
| | 13 Luglio 2008 17:42 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | Hm, du svarar inte ... då lägger jag ut den för en kort omröstning, så får vi se. |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 17:46 |
| | Sorry for not answering in time, I was somehow busy
I don't think however, that in the original was necessary that "each of us" that's why I didn't translate it. |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 17:58 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | Ok ...maybe you ARE right, I think that "Vi är änglar..." could be ok. too. I change that back and then lets see what the "crocodiles" think. |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 18:37 |
| lenabNumero di messaggi: 1084 | "Vi är alla änglar"...kunde kanske vara en variant.
"med en enda vinge" , kunde kanske sägas "med bara en vinge". Vad tycker ni? |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 19:20 |
| | det borde vara
Vi är var och en Änglar... |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 19:28 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | Lilian,
det verkar som om du bör översätta "each of us", antingen tillbaka till "Vi är var och en Änglar..." så som också pollito86 anser, eller enligt lenabs förslag "Vi är alla änglar..".
Jag tycker personligen att "en enda vinge" funkar bra, men om du gillar lenabs förslag så kan du justera även det. |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 19:32 |
| | The original is not in perfect English, we could improve it in many ways.
Of course, several variants could be used here, but I think the meaning is accurate the way it is.
I've done the Br. Portuguese version observing some "poetic licence" as well.
But it's up to you, Pia. I'm sure you'll find the best structure or reject it . Feel free to do so, OK?
You know I wouldn't mind at all. |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 19:35 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | Hm ..ok, I like lenabs suggest about "alla", so my suggest is that you change to: "Vi är alla änglar med en enda vinge, och vi kan endast flyga omfamnandes varandra"
Ok for you? |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 19:37 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 19:47 |
| | lenab's suggestion sounds fine to me.
I'll edit that.
About the rejection: since we are adopting the "Zero Tolerance" policy concerning the English translations I think it would be a good idea to extend the measure to other languages. You'd save a lot of time with long-lasting corrections like this. |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 19:58 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | ok |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 20:00 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | Please pirulito, motivate why you vote negative.
CC: pirulito |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 20:26 |
| gamineNumero di messaggi: 4611 | Have voted for this translation because " we are each of us angels" isn't necessary and the Swedih thanslation is just ok , and no need to discuss the meaning of one word!!! |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 20:34 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | Please pollito86, motivate why you vote against. CC: pollito86 |
| | 13 Luglio 2008 21:24 |
| | For me it looks good now!
Vi är alla änglar med endast en vinge och bara genom att omfamna varand kan vi flyga.
|
| | 13 Luglio 2008 21:40 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | pollito86 ...I didn't saw that you have already given your reason, sorry for my misstake. CC: pollito86 |
| | 14 Luglio 2008 12:48 |
| piasNumero di messaggi: 8113 | Tack samtliga för inlägg, nu godkänner jag den. |