| | |
| | 14 birželis 2011 14:12 |
| | Hi Jair,
"illuminate" is a transitive verb, therefore we'll need an object here.
illuminates you? |
| | 21 liepa 2011 15:02 |
| LeinŽinučių kiekis: 3389 | or maybe 'shines'? (even if 'a day that shines' doesn't make much sense to me - but maybe I just need a bit more imagination ) |
| | 21 liepa 2011 18:43 |
| | |
| | 21 liepa 2011 18:54 |
| | I think "shines" is fine, it doesn't make less sense than in Danish, since also in Danish it sound a bit awkward |
| | 21 liepa 2011 19:42 |
| | Perhaps "...any shiny day,..." would fit |
| | 21 liepa 2011 20:36 |
| piasŽinučių kiekis: 8113 | hver dag = every day
"som lyser" might be a metaphor for the dawning... (which dawns) |
| | 21 liepa 2011 21:26 |
| | |
| | 21 liepa 2011 21:42 |
| | It's a rather akward translation to Danish of the Latin proverb "Omnem crede diem tibi deluxisse supremum" which literally does actually mean something like "Believe that each day that shines to you is your last one".
I do, however, believe that pias is right that the meaning of this is: "Know that each day that dawns may be your last". Either way, I think that both the literal and the non-literal translation should be mentioned.
|
| | 21 liepa 2011 22:06 |
| | What about this?
"Consider each day that dawns as the last for you." CC: pias |
| | 22 liepa 2011 00:53 |
| | Sorry to be soo late. Don't have much time free as I have to take care of my friens young kids.
Anita may be right.
I think that it can be understood like this too:
'Believe that each day which shines to you(which make you happy)is your last'.
CC: lilian canale pias |
| | 22 liepa 2011 01:01 |
| | Just noticed That Anita has proposed the same proposal as I have. But still like 'which make you happy'.
Anita, pls. |
| | 22 liepa 2011 11:53 |
| piasŽinučių kiekis: 8113 | Awww, I like your proposal too Lene
Agree with Anita that the non-literal translation(s) should be mentioned too, maybe as a note. |
| | 22 liepa 2011 14:13 |
| | |
| | 22 liepa 2011 14:34 |
| | Thank you girls
I've placed the non-literal version in the remarks. |
| | 23 liepa 2011 00:19 |
| | |
| | 24 liepa 2011 18:00 |
| | I guess the Latin translation of this phrase is the one Anita wrote in her first message, isn't it?
So I think she deserves those points |
| | 25 liepa 2011 00:37 |
| | Agree with you Alex. |