Cucumis - Nemokama vertimo internete paslauga
. .



Vertimas - Danų-Anglų - Jeg gÃ¥r i chock og tænder en smøg, hvis jorden...

Esamas statusasVertimas
Šis tekstas išverstas į šias kalbas: DanųAnglųŠvedų

Pavadinimas
Jeg går i chock og tænder en smøg, hvis jorden...
Tekstas
Pateikta martin007
Originalo kalba: Danų

Jeg går i chock og tænder en smøg, hvis jorden går under.

Pavadinimas
I will go into shock and light a cigarette ...
Vertimas
Anglų

Išvertė pias
Kalba, į kurią verčiama: Anglų

I will go into shock and light a cigarette if the world comes to an end.
Validated by kafetzou - 21 spalis 2007 16:35





Paskutinės žinutės

Autorius
Pranešimas

20 spalis 2007 03:57

kafetzou
Žinučių kiekis: 7963
Something is wrong here, as Ian has pointed out above.

CC: wkn

20 spalis 2007 06:26

pias
Žinučių kiekis: 8113
ok...The one who lights the cigarette is me =I
Should it be corrected to:

I am shocked and I'm lighting a cigarette,
if this is the end of the world.


??

20 spalis 2007 14:34

kafetzou
Žinučių kiekis: 7963
OK; I've replaced your original translation with this new version and re-set the voting.

20 spalis 2007 16:42

Anita_Luciano
Žinučių kiekis: 1670
This is what the Danish original actually says:

"If the world comes to an end, I will go into shock and light a cigarette".


20 spalis 2007 17:56

pias
Žinučių kiekis: 8113
hm....you again Anita_Luciano
I guess I have to trust you, AND actually it sounds better to my eares to put it that way..
but(maybe a very stupid question)is it common in Danish language to put the sences not in direct series? It seem to me that they turn the sences a bit backward.

Kafetzou, should I correct that to Anita's proposal?

20 spalis 2007 18:09

Anita_Luciano
Žinučių kiekis: 1670
I think it would also have sounded better to MY ears if the sentence had been like this: "Hvis jorden går under, går jeg i chok og tænder en cigaret", but it´s not wrong (at all) to write it the other way. And as to whether or not it´s commom in Danish.... humm... I guess it is. "jeg tror, at mit hjerte ville briste, hvis du forlod mig", "jeg sender et brev til dig imorgen, hvis jeg kan finde et posthus her i byen". But it also goes for this kind of sentence construction that you can always turn them the other way around and it would still be just as "correct Danish" as the other way ( --> "Hvis du forlod mig, tror jeg, at mit hjerte ville briste", "hvis jeg kan finde et posthus her i byen, sender jeg et brev til dig imorgen".)

20 spalis 2007 18:16

pias
Žinučių kiekis: 8113
OK, good to know.
Thanks for telling me.

20 spalis 2007 22:39

kafetzou
Žinučių kiekis: 7963
I don't understand why people voted yes on this. I have edited and will again re-set the voting. Thanks, Anita_Luciano for your help.

P.S. The order of the two clauses doesn't matter in English either.

21 spalis 2007 11:37

procrastinator
Žinučių kiekis: 5
Engelsk chock = dansk chok

21 spalis 2007 11:46

Anita_Luciano
Žinučių kiekis: 1670
procrastinator: Not according to my dictionaries.
Danish "chok" = English "shock"

22 spalis 2007 07:19

wkn
Žinučių kiekis: 332
... I've been on a concert tour these past days, that's why I haven't commented. The result is fine and I agree completely with Anita's lectures in Danish :-)