| |
|
Vertimas - Danų-Anglų - Jeg gÃ¥r i chock og tænder en smøg, hvis jorden...Esamas statusas Vertimas
| Jeg gÃ¥r i chock og tænder en smøg, hvis jorden... | | Originalo kalba: Danų
Jeg går i chock og tænder en smøg, hvis jorden går under. |
|
| I will go into shock and light a cigarette ... | VertimasAnglų Išvertė pias | Kalba, į kurią verčiama: Anglų
I will go into shock and light a cigarette if the world comes to an end. |
|
Validated by kafetzou - 21 spalis 2007 16:35
Paskutinės žinutės | | | | | 20 spalis 2007 03:57 | | | Something is wrong here, as Ian has pointed out above. CC: wkn | | | 20 spalis 2007 06:26 | | piasŽinučių kiekis: 8114 | ok...The one who lights the cigarette is me =I
Should it be corrected to:
I am shocked and I'm lighting a cigarette,
if this is the end of the world.
?? | | | 20 spalis 2007 14:34 | | | OK; I've replaced your original translation with this new version and re-set the voting. | | | 20 spalis 2007 16:42 | | | This is what the Danish original actually says:
"If the world comes to an end, I will go into shock and light a cigarette".
| | | 20 spalis 2007 17:56 | | piasŽinučių kiekis: 8114 | hm....you again Anita_Luciano
I guess I have to trust you, AND actually it sounds better to my eares to put it that way..
but(maybe a very stupid question)is it common in Danish language to put the sences not in direct series? It seem to me that they turn the sences a bit backward.
Kafetzou, should I correct that to Anita's proposal? | | | 20 spalis 2007 18:09 | | | I think it would also have sounded better to MY ears if the sentence had been like this: "Hvis jorden gÃ¥r under, gÃ¥r jeg i chok og tænder en cigaret", but it´s not wrong (at all) to write it the other way. And as to whether or not it´s commom in Danish.... humm... I guess it is. "jeg tror, at mit hjerte ville briste, hvis du forlod mig", "jeg sender et brev til dig imorgen, hvis jeg kan finde et posthus her i byen". But it also goes for this kind of sentence construction that you can always turn them the other way around and it would still be just as "correct Danish" as the other way ( --> "Hvis du forlod mig, tror jeg, at mit hjerte ville briste", "hvis jeg kan finde et posthus her i byen, sender jeg et brev til dig imorgen".) | | | 20 spalis 2007 18:16 | | piasŽinučių kiekis: 8114 | OK, good to know.
Thanks for telling me. | | | 20 spalis 2007 22:39 | | | I don't understand why people voted yes on this. I have edited and will again re-set the voting. Thanks, Anita_Luciano for your help.
P.S. The order of the two clauses doesn't matter in English either. | | | 21 spalis 2007 11:37 | | | Engelsk chock = dansk chok | | | 21 spalis 2007 11:46 | | | procrastinator: Not according to my dictionaries.
Danish "chok" = English "shock" | | | 22 spalis 2007 07:19 | | wknŽinučių kiekis: 332 | ... I've been on a concert tour these past days, that's why I haven't commented. The result is fine and I agree completely with Anita's lectures in Danish :-) |
|
| |
|