| |
|
翻訳 - 英語 -トルコ語 - The Ministry of Foreign Affairs presents its...現状 翻訳
ドキュメントが次の言語に翻訳されました:
カテゴリ 手紙 / 電子メール - 社会 / 人々 / 政治 この翻訳依頼は意味だけで結構です。 | The Ministry of Foreign Affairs presents its... | | 原稿の言語: 英語
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs presents its compliments to the Embassy of the United Kingdom and the honour to refer to the Embassy's Note No. 16 of the 4th of february 1966 on the subject of the supply of three complete IFF systems for the coastal warning radar sites at Åžile, Marmara Island and Zonguldak.
Ankara,May,1966
Embassy of the United Kingdom Ankara | | Bu metini bulmak için çok uğraştım. Burada ne anlatılmak isteniyor fikrim var fakat ayrıntıları yardım ederseniz öğrenmek istiyorum. Bunu diplomatik yazışmalar kategorisinden buldum bu metni resmi dile uyarlamanız benim açımdan iyi olur. Şimdiden teşekkürler iyi çalışmalar |
|
| DışiÅŸleri Bakanlığı | | 翻訳の言語: トルコ語
Dışişleri Bakanlığı, İngiltere Büyükelçiliğine tebriklerini iletir ve Şile, Marmara Adası ve Zonguldak'taki sahil uyarı radar bölgeleri için üç tam IFF sisteminin sağlanması konulu 4 Şubat 1966 tarihli 16 numaralı Büyükelçilik Notuna atıfta bulunmak ister.
Ankara, Mayıs,1966
İngiltere Büyükelçiliği Ankara
| | smy's note: ------- "the honour to refer to" cümlesinde eksik kelime var, doğrusu "has the honour to refer to" olacak |
|
最終承認・編集者 smy - 2007年 12月 27日 17:02
最新記事 | | | | | 2007年 12月 25日 14:23 | | | this translation is really good ankarahastanesi, I've made some edits but I'm not sure about the meaning of "Embassy's Note (Büyükelçilik tezkeresi)" | | | 2007年 12月 25日 16:38 | | | it may be:'büyükelçilik notu' or 'büyükelçilik kaydı' and last part of the translation may be 'Büyükelçilik notundan dolayı onurlandığını sunmaktadır'. In my opinion 'baÅŸvuru' is not suitable. thank you very much for your helping.
| | | 2007年 12月 25日 16:43 | | | you're welcome ankarahastanesi
'büyükelçilik notu' is better and the translation for: "the honour to refer to the..." must be like above. But we may have a poll | | | 2007年 12月 25日 22:51 | | | The phrase "present its compliments to" is just a formal salutation.
Also, "the honour to refer to" is not "baÅŸvuru yapma onurunu" - but I don't understand what verb goes with "the honour" - "presents the honour to refer to" doesn't make sense. There is something wrong with the original text here. | | | 2007年 12月 25日 22:53 | | | Masterburak, "and the honour" kısmında bir kelime eksik deÄŸil mi? | | | 2007年 12月 26日 12:30 | | | I think you are right about there is a missing verb here Kafetzou, I've made a search in google and here is a paragraph which is nearly the same with the source text here (http://fletcher.tufts.edu/multi/texts/bh903.txt):
---------
"The Embassy of the United States of America presents its compliments to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and has the honor to refer to the Agreement on the..."
------
I've found similar texts and each has this verb ( has/have the honor to refer to) and it should be the case here.
So, may that be "atıfta bulunma şerefine/onuruna sahiptir", but I'm not sure, this is rather pompous style of writing , what it is the alternative sentence for " has/have the honor to refer to..."?
| | | 2007年 12月 26日 15:43 | | | "would like to refer to"? It simply means that whatever comes next will be about Note No. 16. | | | 2007年 12月 26日 16:44 | | | then it would be "gönderme yapmak/atıfta bulunmak ister" ankarahastanesi, could you edit it? | | | 2007年 12月 26日 17:21 | | | It has nothing to do with "sending" - does "gönderme" have another meaning here? | | | 2007年 12月 26日 20:41 | | | atfen onur duyduÄŸunu sunmaktadır:gönderme yaparak onurlandığını sunmaktadır:atıfta bulunarak onurlandığını sunmaktadır. | | | 2007年 12月 26日 20:47 | | | Sorry - you lost me. Türkçem var da o kadar yok. | | | 2007年 12月 27日 16:31 | | | gönderme yapmak = to refer to | | | 2007年 12月 27日 16:38 | | | I've edited it according your suggestion Kafetzou (would like to refer to), and it means "atıfta bulunmak/gönderme yapmak ister" | | | 2007年 12月 27日 17:01 | | | it seems everybody agrees on it's correctness now, thank you all |
|
| |
|