번역 - 영어-일본어 - Translators-linguistic-knowledge현재 상황 번역
분류 웹사이트 / 블로그 / 포럼 - 컴퓨터 / 인터넷 | Translators-linguistic-knowledge | | 원문 언어: 영어
Cucumis is a community of translators who share their linguistic knowledge and help each other online |
|
| Translators-linguistic-knowledge | 번역 일본어
ccdj에 의해서 번역되어짐 | 번역될 언어: 일본어
「Cucumisã€ã¨ã¯ç¿»è¨³è€…ã®ã‚³ãƒŸãƒ¥ãƒ‹ãƒ†ã‚£ã§ã‚ã‚Šã€ãƒ¡ãƒ³ãƒãƒ¼ãŒè‡ªåˆ†ã®è¨€èªžçŸ¥è˜ã‚’æä¾›ã—ã€ãŠäº’ã„ã«åŠ©ã‘åˆã†ã‚ªãƒ³ãƒ©ã‚¤ãƒ³ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã§ã™ã€‚ |
|
IanMegill2에 의해서 마지막으로 검증 또는 수정되었습니다 - 2010년 10월 24일 06:37
마지막 글 | | | | | 2010년 10월 23일 14:20 | | | I think
Cucumisã¨ã¯ç¿»è¨³è€…ã®ã‚³ãƒŸãƒ¥ãƒ‹ãƒ†ã‚£ã§ã‚ã‚Šã€
メンãƒãƒ¼ãŒè‡ªåˆ†ã®æŠ€èƒ½ã‚’æä¾›ã—ã¦åŠ©ã‘åˆã†ã‚ªãƒ³ãƒ©ã‚¤ãƒ³ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã§ã™ã€‚[/b]
互ã„ã« is not needed,because åˆã† of verb 助㑠means
"help each other". 互ã„ã«åŠ©ã‘åˆã† sounds like "help each other each other" in english. | | | 2010년 10월 23일 16:32 | | | Ian, could you check this translation and Mikhail's input.
Thanks CC: IanMegill2 | | | 2010년 10월 24일 06:31 | | | Original Translation before edits:
「Cucumisã€ã¨ã¯ç¿»è¨³è€…ã®ã‚³ãƒŸãƒ¥ãƒ‹ãƒ†ã‚£ã€ãƒ¡ãƒ³ãƒãƒ¼ãŒè‡ªåˆ†ã®æŠ€èƒ½ã‚’æä¾›ã—ã€ãŠäº’ã„ã«åŠ©ã‘åˆã†ã‚ªãƒ³ãƒ©ã‚¤ãƒ³ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã§ã™
Notes:
Mihail's grammatical addition ("de ari" ) sounded better to me, too.
As for the phrase used to translate "help each other", the translator's version sounded all right to me, but just to make sure, I Googled it as a phrase (in "quotation marks", so it wouldn't get searched for in pieces), and it came up with 197,000+ hits, so obviously some other Japanese people consider it to not be too redundant to use...
On the other hand, "linguistic knowledge" had simply been translated with a very general word meaning "ability" (in spite of the fact that the exact term for "linguistic knowledge" is also used in Japanese): this was corrected. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0ba5/c0ba5057426bb7f19f92540e3264ef82f4aa12a1" alt="" | | | 2010년 10월 25일 02:06 | | | This is indeed a better translation (ã§ã‚ã‚Šã€ã€€è¨€èªžçŸ¥è˜). As for the redundancy, i don't know as it is indeed (mis?)used quite often here. |
|
|