| | |
| | 16 February 2008 23:43 |
| goncinNumber of messages: 3706 | Costumers -> customers |
| | 16 February 2008 23:54 |
| | Ops.. é mesmo, 'clientes' - errei quando digitava.
Dziękuję Goncy |
| | 18 February 2008 09:40 |
| | we invite you to shopping is not acceptable English. Try again.
Best,
David |
| | 19 February 2008 08:32 |
| | Try to say something else than "invite you to shopping" maybe invite you to shop here, or something. "invite you to shopping" is not correct English |
| | 20 February 2008 04:42 |
| | Hi David,
do you think "invite you to go shopping" would be good here?
Regards
CC: dramati |
| | 21 February 2008 09:07 |
| | there's no word about "stone baked pizzas" in original text, but "stone FOR baking pizzas" |
| | 21 February 2008 09:12 |
| | not correct translation. "Stones for baking pizzas, breads and cakes will be available", not "stone baked pizzas, breads and cakes will be available". Much difference |
| | 21 February 2008 11:04 |
| | What do you mean by "stone baked pizzas"? |
| | 21 February 2008 11:41 |
| | Hi Olesniczanin
A "stone baked" pizza is a pizza that has been cooked upon a stone slab, rather than on an oven grill.
Hope this helps
Bises
Tantine |
| | 21 February 2008 20:04 |
| | there's no word in original text about "stone baked pizzas" but about " stones for baking pizzas, breads and cakes" which will be delivered from that date |
| | 22 February 2008 12:08 |
| | Yeah Tantine but the original text says about a stone, NOT about pizzas. Just like the others say, it's a stone for baking pizzas, breads and cakes. I think that makes a huge difference.
Regards |
| | 23 February 2008 04:32 |
| | Humm I knew I would have problems with this.
I misunderstood the text.
I thought that 'stone-baked pizza' was part of the offer like the breads and cakes.
But it's really talking about the STONE itself you use to bake these things. Like this one I think >
Maybe an English expert could change it to 'stone for baking pizzas' ? |
| | 7 March 2008 16:22 |
| | Yeah. I wonder why the translation was accepted even though many people had said it was wrong. Now the author himself claims he was wrong and no expert changes it.
Note that we have Swedish version now and even though I don't know Swedish I believe it's wrong too since it was probably based on the English text.
Regards. |
| | 8 March 2008 00:14 |
| | Hi Olesniczanin
As you can see, I have edited the English version here. Let me know if the edit is ok.
I will cc a Swedish expert so as the Swedish version can be corrected if necessary.
Thanks for your vigilance and your help
Bises
Tantine
|
| | 8 March 2008 00:16 |
| | |
| | 8 March 2008 10:15 |
| piasNumber of messages: 8113 | Thanks a lot Tantine.
That was different from how the Swedish is translated right now, some edits to do here!
|
| | 8 March 2008 22:07 |
| | It seems fine now.
Thanks for your cooperation .
Regards. |