| |
|
Translation - Portuguese brazilian-English - amo ser ruiva!Current status Translation
| | Text Submitted by 27 | Source language: Portuguese brazilian
amo ser ruiva! | Remarks about the translation | |
|
| | | Target language: English
I love being red-haired! |
|
Last messages | | | | | 23 May 2008 14:44 | | goncinNumber of messages: 3706 | Well, I used to know that "ruiva" was translated as "redhead"... | | | 23 May 2008 14:57 | | | redhead, ginger, red-haired,
are all correct.
See? We learn something new everyday.
| | | 23 May 2008 18:56 | | | I love being ginger. | | | 23 May 2008 23:50 | | ollkaNumber of messages: 149 | Here, Lilian, I think I need to understand this.
You make a translation and then you are obviously the expert who has to accept it, and naturally (one should hope) you are sure that you've translated it correctly - yet you set up a poll claiming you don't understand the original? What's up with that, pray tell? Should others do that too before accepting their own translations?
Sorry, all puzzled. | | | 24 May 2008 05:23 | | | Hi Ollka,
Don't be so puzzled!
Yes, when we do a translation into a language we are to evaluate, we set a poll in order to get the other users' support on that validation. This gives the others the chance of correcting our work if needed. We are experts, but we can fail now and then.
When we validate our own work this way, with overwhelming positive votes, no doubts will be raised about it being correct.
This is my opinion and the way I like to do things, but we are not "required" to do so. It's just a matter of choice.
Thanks for asking, I guess it may look weird saying that "I don't understand the source language" once we have translated it, but that's just the denomination of the device. | | | 24 May 2008 03:06 | | ollkaNumber of messages: 149 | Gotcha. Less puzzled. Thankful. You clever.
*cave person retreats back into all-nighter work cave* |
|
| |
|