Käännös - Heprea-Englanti - Molim vas ako moyete da prevedete ovaj text:..

Hi ollka,

What do you mean by: "But I have no faith"?

By that I mean a literal translation of "en be emona". I think it might be implied that (s)he has no faith in the other person, but it is not said directly.

Could we invert the syntax and still keep the meaning?
Instead of :
"But I have no faith, and don't forget that we can still be friends"
could it be:
"Don't forget that we can still be friends, but I have no faith anymore.(I don't trust you anymore)"

What do you think?

I'm not sure. It's all one sentence in the original. I'm reluctant to make changes that would bring added meaning into the text. You think this would be safe to do?

Well I don't know what the original says exactly. My job is getting a text which makes sense and sounds well in English. That's why I ask you if the change in the syntax would affect the meaning, if not, even having to add one or two words we can get a better translation.
We have already talked about that some time ago, remember?
But, if you think it would change the meaning, of course we can't do it.

It's the terms: it's present not past -
1-instead of "you were" it should be "you are".

2-Literally you can say I have no faith but the meaning here is: "But, I've been hurt or touched".

Good Luck