Cucumis - Besplatan online prevodilački servis

Home

Registruj se

. .

•‎Home
•‎Podnošenje novog teksta na prevod
•‎Traženi prevodi
•‎Završeni prevodi
•‎

Omiljeni prevodi
•‎

•‎Prevod web stranice
•‎Traži

▪Besplatna razmena stranih jezika

•‎English
•‎Türkçe
•‎Français
•‎Español
•‎Italiano
•‎Português brasileiro
•‎Deutsch
•‎Română
•‎عربي
•‎Русский
•‎Svenska
•‎Ελληνικά
•‎Български
•‎עברית
•‎Shqip

▪▪‎Srpski

•‎Nederlands
•‎Dansk
•‎Português
•‎Polski
•‎汉语(简体)
•‎Lietuvių
•‎Norsk
•‎فارسی
•‎Suomi
•‎Hrvatski
•‎日本語
•‎Català
•‎Esperanto
•‎한국어
•‎Українська
•‎Føroyskt
•‎नेपाली
•‎Kiswahili

Prevod - Engleski-Turski - bacteria

Trenutni status ‎Prevod

Ovaj tekst je raspoloziv na sledecim jezicima:

Engleski

Turski

Kategorija Izraz - Nauka

Natpis	bacteria
Tekst Podnet od yozgur	Izvorni jezik: Engleski there is some interest in its ability to persist as a low-grade irritant in the udder, which, by provoking a mild neutrophil response, may protect the udder against infection by more virulent bacteria

Natpis	bakteri
Prevod Turski Preveo london20	Željeni jezik: Turski hayvan memesinde bulunan, az derecede tahriÅŸ edici hafif nÃ¶trofil karÅŸÄ±lÄ±ÄŸÄ±, memeyi Ã¶ldÃ¼rÃ¼cÃ¼ bakterin enfeksiyonuna karÅŸÄ± koruyabilmek gibi bazÄ± ilginÃ§ yetenekleri vardÄ±r.

Poslednja provera i obrada od FIGEN KIRCI - 11 Mart 2009 10:50

Poslednja poruka

	Autor	Poruka
		11 Mart 2009 00:40
	FIGEN KIRCI Broj poruka: 2543	Hallo, dear admin! The request (and requestor) above, and that one in the link below are completely same. And both of them are translated. I was about to evaluate this one that was made first, by london20. I'm witing for your suggestion! http://www.cucumis.org/tercume_12_t/ceviriyi-incele_v_199263.html
		11 Mart 2009 00:44
	lilian canale Broj poruka: 14972	Hi FIGEN, I can see that the requests are identical, but the translations are quite different Is one of them much better than the other?
		11 Mart 2009 01:01
	FIGEN KIRCI Broj poruka: 2543	this one is much better, lilian!
		11 Mart 2009 02:30
	lilian canale Broj poruka: 14972	OK, so I'll reject the other one and remove the double request. You can evaluate this one.