Cucumis - Besplatan online poslužitelj za prevođenje
. .



Prevođenje - Brazilski portugalski-Latinski - Prazer precisa de Dor

Trenutni statusPrevođenje
Ovaj tekst je dostupan u sljedećim jezicima: Brazilski portugalskiLatinski

Kategorija Društvo / Ljudi / Politika

Naslov
Prazer precisa de Dor
Tekst
Poslao GustavoPohlmann
Izvorni jezik: Brazilski portugalski

Sem alguma coisa para fazer este prazer valer a pena.
Primjedbe o prijevodu
IN English it would be: Without Something to make this pleasure worth it

Naslov
Voluptas eget sollicitudinis
Prevođenje
Latinski

Preveo Efylove
Ciljni jezik: Latinski

Sine aliqua re quae hanc voluptatem sollicitudine dignam faciat.
Primjedbe o prijevodu
According to the English translation under the text.
Posljednji potvrdio i uredio Aneta B. - 31 srpanj 2010 01:30





Najnovije poruke

Autor/ica
Poruka

14 srpanj 2010 16:30

Aneta B.
Broj poruka: 4487
"Sine ulla re quae hanc voluptatem sollicitudine dignam faciat".
I would translate:
--> Without something what makes this pleasure worth in anxiety.

Is this the meaning of the Portuguese line, dear?


14 srpanj 2010 16:48

Efylove
Broj poruka: 1015
I follow the English version under the source text. You'd better to ask Lilian for a bridge...

The idea was:
"Without something that makes this pleasure worth OF anxiety"
where "worth of anxiety" = "valer a pena"

with a relative clause + conjunctive to give the idea of a final clause...

14 srpanj 2010 17:00

Aneta B.
Broj poruka: 4487
Since Lilly is on her vacation now I'd rather ask someone else.

---
Hello, dear friends!
Could one of you help me here with the bridge, please?

CC: casper tavernello Lizzzz

14 srpanj 2010 21:07

Lizzzz
Broj poruka: 234
Hi Efy and Aneta

It sounds weird but the title helps a little to understand the sentence, at least, it's my opinion. Let's wait to see if Casper agrees with me

Title: Pleasure needs pain

Without something (a reason) to make this pleasure worth it(the pain).

15 srpanj 2010 18:46

Aneta B.
Broj poruka: 4487
Dear Efee!
You know, I'm wondering whether "sine ulla re" means "without someting"...

ullus,a,um with negation means "nobody, nothing", so "sine ulle re" I would rather translate "without anything" or "with nothing".
Shouldn't be rather "sine aliqua re" here?

Dear Lizzz!
Looking at your bridge I am wondering where is the conjugated verb here? Maybe this is the case when the infinitive creates the purpose clause, which should by started from "ut" in Latin? Am I wrong?

15 srpanj 2010 19:54

Efylove
Broj poruka: 1015
"Sine aliqua re" would be perfect, I guess.