Tafsiri - Kireno cha Kibrazili-Kilatini - Prazer precisa de Dor

"Sine ulla re quae hanc voluptatem sollicitudine dignam faciat".
I would translate:
--> Without something what makes this pleasure worth in anxiety.

Is this the meaning of the Portuguese line, dear?

I follow the English version under the source text. You'd better to ask Lilian for a bridge...

The idea was:
"Without something that makes this pleasure worth OF anxiety"
where "worth of anxiety" = "valer a pena"

with a relative clause + conjunctive to give the idea of a final clause...

Since Lilly is on her vacation now I'd rather ask someone else.

---
Hello, dear friends!
Could one of you help me here with the bridge, please?

CC: casper tavernello Lizzzz

Hi Efy and Aneta

It sounds weird but the title helps a little to understand the sentence, at least, it's my opinion. Let's wait to see if Casper agrees with me

Title: Pleasure needs pain

Without something (a reason) to make this pleasure worth it(the pain).

Dear Efee!
You know, I'm wondering whether "sine ulla re" means "without someting"...

ullus,a,um with negation means "nobody, nothing", so "sine ulle re" I would rather translate "without anything" or "with nothing".
Shouldn't be rather "sine aliqua re" here?

Dear Lizzz!
Looking at your bridge I am wondering where is the conjugated verb here? Maybe this is the case when the infinitive creates the purpose clause, which should by started from "ut" in Latin? Am I wrong?

"Sine aliqua re" would be perfect, I guess.