Traducción - Portugués brasileño-Latín - Prazer precisa de DorEstado actual Traducción
Este texto está disponible en los siguientes idiomas:
Categoría Sociedad / Gente / Polìtica | | | Idioma de origen: Portugués brasileño
Sem alguma coisa para fazer este prazer valer a pena. | Nota acerca de la traducción | IN English it would be: Without Something to make this pleasure worth it |
|
| Voluptas eget sollicitudinis | TraducciónLatín Traducido por Efylove | Idioma de destino: Latín
Sine aliqua re quae hanc voluptatem sollicitudine dignam faciat. | Nota acerca de la traducción | According to the English translation under the text. |
|
Última validación o corrección por Aneta B. - 31 Julio 2010 01:30
Último mensaje | | | | | 14 Julio 2010 16:30 | | | "Sine ulla re quae hanc voluptatem sollicitudine dignam faciat".
I would translate:
--> Without something what makes this pleasure worth in anxiety.
Is this the meaning of the Portuguese line, dear?
| | | 14 Julio 2010 16:48 | | | I follow the English version under the source text. You'd better to ask Lilian for a bridge...
The idea was:
"Without something that makes this pleasure worth OF anxiety"
where "worth of anxiety" = "valer a pena"
with a relative clause + conjunctive to give the idea of a final clause... | | | 14 Julio 2010 17:00 | | | Since Lilly is on her vacation now I'd rather ask someone else.
---
Hello, dear friends!
Could one of you help me here with the bridge, please? CC: casper tavernello Lizzzz | | | 14 Julio 2010 21:07 | | | Hi Efy and Aneta
It sounds weird but the title helps a little to understand the sentence, at least, it's my opinion. Let's wait to see if Casper agrees with me
Title: Pleasure needs pain
Without something (a reason) to make this pleasure worth it(the pain). | | | 15 Julio 2010 18:46 | | | Dear Efee!
You know, I'm wondering whether "sine ulla re" means "without someting"...
ullus,a,um with negation means "nobody, nothing", so "sine ulle re" I would rather translate "without anything" or "with nothing".
Shouldn't be rather "sine aliqua re" here?
Dear Lizzz!
Looking at your bridge I am wondering where is the conjugated verb here? Maybe this is the case when the infinitive creates the purpose clause, which should by started from "ut" in Latin? Am I wrong? | | | 15 Julio 2010 19:54 | | | "Sine aliqua re" would be perfect, I guess. |
|
|