| | |
| |
2009년 4월 10일 14:47 |
| | Hi Mettarat,
I've made some adjustments. Do you agree?
Does it convey the meaning? |
| |
2009년 4월 10일 19:23 |
| | The text itself is not very clear. |
| |
2009년 4월 10일 19:28 |
| | So, what could be improved in the translation Sunchai? CC: Sunchai |
| |
2009년 4월 10일 21:11 |
| | Hi Lilian,
Actually, I'm not quite remember that which part that you corrected it.... It must be some grammar error right?
I want to ask you about the sentence "If it's to be together without trusting each other"
Should it be "If being together without trusting each other"? or "If to be together without trusting each other"?
What you think? |
| |
2009년 4월 10일 21:53 |
| | Your two suggestions are grammatically wrong, but better options could be:
"If we are together, but no longer trust each other, we'd better..."
or
"Since we don't trust each other anymore, we'd better..."
|
| |
2009년 4월 11일 05:57 |
| | But Pia (the girl) ,in this sentense, she didn't mention about her and her boyfriend.... she was saying about generally relationship.
Then, what is your suggestion? |
| |
2009년 4월 11일 13:30 |
| | In that case, to say it in general, not specifically for her and her boyfriend, the way is:
"if two people don't trust each other, they'd better take different ways" |
| |
2009년 4월 11일 13:59 |
| | Thank you so much Lilian, but I'm thinking again that she might say about her and her boyfriend but anyway....as I said she didn't mention that...
So, I think it should be "If we are together, but no longer trust each other, we'd better go in different ways" |
| |
2009년 4월 11일 14:08 |
| | I'm glad you finally decided.
Perhaps Sunchai can help us on that.
Sunchai, do you agree with the choice? CC: Sunchai |
| |
2009년 4월 11일 22:47 |
| | I agree with the last choice "If we are together, but no longer trust each other, we'd better go in different ways"
But the sentence "I just can do that." sounds quite strange to me. I would rather say "That's all I can do."
Also the following sentences, I would say "Nana, you weren't in the situation so you don't know how terrible that was."
|
| |
2009년 4월 11일 23:34 |
| | Well...it seems that there are some things to correct.
What do you say Mettarat? |
| |
2009년 4월 18일 23:50 |
| | According to what you said under the French version, Sunchai, I edited with "nana, tu ne l'as pas entendu m'insulter, tu ne sais pas comment c'était terrible.", I suggest you translate as close as possible to the French version.
So "Nana, you didn't hear him when he insulted me, you don't know how terrible it was".
As if the source-text in Thai tells about this term, "insulted", it has to be mentioned in both versions. |
| |
2009년 4월 19일 09:44 |
| | Uhm.... I agree with Sunchai to about the sentence "That's all I can do."
But the sentence that I wrote "Nana, you didn't meet him, you don't know what kind of person he is." but Sunchai suggested as "Nana, you weren't in the situation so you don't know how terrible that was." It's clearly that we translated in different meaning. It may be because I didn't read it in Thai clearly.... I agree with Sunchai also, then. |
| |
2009년 4월 19일 23:47 |
| | OK, thank you mettarat!  
Suchai, hi! 
What about this "insulted", is it in the original text or do we have to take it off in the French version and replace with "Nana, tu ne peux pas savoir à quel point c'était terrible"? |
| |
2009년 4월 20일 07:11 |
| | Hi Francky5591,
As I have read in Thai version there is no such a thing about "insulting". |
| |
2009년 4월 24일 01:31 |
| | The French phrase would then be "Nana, tu n'as pas été insultée, tu ne sais donc pas à quel point c'était terrible." For me, this should be the nearest translation. |
좋아하는 번역문
이 번역의 "의미" 번역만을 요구합니다. 
에 의해서 마지막으로 검증 또는 수정되었습니다 - 2009년 4월 24일 03:03
