| | |
| | 5 Tammikuu 2009 22:18 |
| | Hmm.. "your dish today ?" instead of "your today's dish". Also auvergne style hotpot, not "auvergne style meet". Some problems with the french here too. |
| | 5 Tammikuu 2009 22:19 |
| | la potée = hotpot and "your dish today" instead of "your today's dish". |
| | 5 Tammikuu 2009 23:07 |
| gamineViestien lukumäärä: 4611 | I would say: your dish today - hotpot from Auvergne, though "hotpot" isn't exactly the same. Hotpot in French gives "stew".Why not keep "Potée Auvergnat".? |
| | 5 Tammikuu 2009 23:26 |
| | In my opinion "Potée Auvergnate" can be left untranslated for most purposes, but if you do want a translation I would go for "Auvergne (style) stew".
"Stew" more accurately describes the way meat is cooked in a " potée ". Therefore: "I would suggest (a) Potée Auvergnate" or "I would suggest (an) Auvergne style stew ", depending on the public you are writing for.
|
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 00:08 |
| | Right, it is better, when it is about a local speciality, like "potée" to keep its original name. We say "spaghettis", don't we? So let's keep "potée".
About "auvergnate", I would suggest "from Auvergne"
One thing that seems weird, is that sentence in French : "j'attends quelqu'un et l'odeur du poireau n'est ce-pas." First,after "n'est-ce pas", one needs an interrogation mark.
And it lacks some element to be understandable : "J'attends quelqu'un et je sens l'odeur du poireau", or even "je peux sentir l'odeur du poireau". |
| | 7 Tammikuu 2009 00:18 |
| gamineViestien lukumäärä: 4611 | I think he means that if he orders leek it would smell so he could say in French "j'attends quelqu'un et ça va sentir le poireau,n'est-ce-pas?" Of course I may be completely wrong. |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 03:49 |
| | "your today's dish" doesn't sound right. |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 07:46 |
| |
j'ai dit: יותר × ×›×•×Ÿ לתרג×I said: L E E K than i told you-
×œ× ×›×ª×•×‘ בטקסט
כמו כן- בסוף הייתי מתרגמת: Mom...in a moment or two/so
×›×™ soon ×–×” שוב ×œ× ×ž×“×•×™×™×§ |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 08:39 |
| | Merci a tous pour vos commentaires. |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 10:20 |
| | Actually..."today's special" would sound better. |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 13:12 |
| bgl88Viestien lukumäärä: 32 | I agree with "today's special"
Or you could also say "the dish of the day" |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 14:07 |
| | I haven't seen his mother for more than a year.
-What is on today's menu?
-Pie with leeks. But i will suggest the potful leek auvergine.
-I said: Leek
-I am waiting for someone and this odour is from the leek, isn't it?
-Mother will arrive any minute from now. |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 15:52 |
| | All this does not sound very English. Moreover, "potee" is not synonymous of meet. It is a dish with cabbage... |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 17:56 |
| | I'm waiting.... don't I?
I understand that I'm waiting for someone and (I'm waiting for) the smell of the leek...
or
I'm waiting for someone and (it's) the smell of the leek, isn't it?
My humble opinion..
|
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 18:15 |
| | Francky, could you please fix this line?
"j'attends quelqu'un et l'odeur du poireau n'est ce-pas." CC: Francky5591 |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 18:26 |
| | j'attends quelqu'un et l'odeur du poireau.... n'est ce-pas.....!!!
Comme le dit francky, c'est une phrase inachevée, sous-entendu:
j'attends quelqu'un et l'odeur du poireau ce n'est pas vraiment bien, n'est ce-pas ? |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 19:05 |
| | |
| | 6 Tammikuu 2009 22:16 |
| | et l'odeur du poireau n'est ce-pas = and leek smell it's not this one
|
| | 7 Tammikuu 2009 09:58 |
| | I'll edit the French text with "et l'odeur du poireau est désagréable, n'est-ce pas?" As it comes out from this discussion that the smell from the leek wouldn't be pleaseant to the one the guy or the girl is waiting for.
Note, there is a French expression where "poireau" and waiting for someone or something have a relationship :
"faire le poireau", but it doesn"t apply here. |