Oversettelse - Fransk-Engelsk - Dévisser le couvercle du compartiment à pile...Nåværende status Oversettelse
Denne teksten kan bli sett i de følgende språkene:
Kategori Forretninger / Jobber | Dévisser le couvercle du compartiment à pile... | Tekst Skrevet av deha | Kildespråk: Fransk
Dévisser le couvercle du compartiment à pile qui se trouve sous le canard (cf schéma) | Anmerkninger gjeldende oversettelsen | |
|
| Unscrew the battery cover | OversettelseEngelsk Oversatt av azitrad | Språket det skal oversettes til: Engelsk
Unscrew the battery cover which is under the duck (see the drawing) |
|
Senest vurdert og redigert av dramati - 5 April 2008 22:33
Siste Innlegg | | | | | 4 April 2008 17:22 | | | perhaps they mean wing with canard
cf means see | | | 4 April 2008 19:51 | | | | | | 4 April 2008 19:59 | | | I found "canard" also in English, as a Canar device. I don't suppose it has anything to do with a duck, so.... any better suggestions? | | | 4 April 2008 20:16 | | | Ce pourrait être un jouet en forme de canard et qui fonctionne avec des piles | | | 5 April 2008 01:18 | | | Hi Azitrad, Hi Dramati
I totally agree with Turkishmiss here, this must be a battery operated toy duck
Whilst the word "canard" does actually exist in english, the different definitions to be found in my Chamber's 20thC English Dictionary do not seem adapted to the manipulation described in the french original. In english a canard can be a false rumour (like a "canular" in french) or it can be an "early, duck-like type or aeroplane. Neither of these two definitions go with the idea of "unscrew(ing) a battery cover"
So I totally agree that the term canard has to be translated by the word "duck".
| | | 5 April 2008 01:35 | | | le mot "canard" pas traduit.mettre "to"devant infinitif.mot "pile" pas traduit.pas compris "drawing"? | | | 5 April 2008 06:13 | | | "Canard" caught me by surprise when I first read the text. I agree - it's probably a toy duck. | | | 5 April 2008 08:46 | | | oki doki
I really never thought about a toy duck
| | | 5 April 2008 19:30 | | | I thought this might bring on a bit of discussion. So, I would hate to reject this just because of the debate, let me know the best way to edit it so that it passes. | | | 5 April 2008 19:33 | | | Dramati,
I think this one is correct now. |
|
|