अनुबाद - फ्रान्सेली-अंग्रेजी - Les organisations internationales sont donc impuissantes?

अहिलेको अवस्था ‎अनुबाद

यो हरफ निम्न भाषामा उपलब्ध छ:

Category Newspapers - Society / People / Politics

शीर्षक	Les organisations internationales sont donc impuissantes?
हरफ Francky5591द्वारा बुझाइएको	स्रोत भाषा: फ्रान्सेली En quelques annÃ©es, le programme alimentaire mondial a perdu la moitiÃ© de son budget, qui n'est plus que de 3,2 milliards. Les pays riches ne cotisent plus. Ils doivent sauver leurs banques. C'est Ã dire les spÃ©culateurs. La lutte contre la faim dans le monde passe aprÃ¨s. J'appelle cela un crime contre l'humanitÃ©.
अनुबादका लागि चाहिन सक्ने थप जानकारी	Propos de Jean Ziegler, recueillis par un quotidien rÃ©gional franÃ§ais, au sujet de son livre "Destruction massive".

शीर्षक

So, are international organizations powerless?

अनुबाद

अंग्रेजी

alexfattद्वारा अनुबाद गरिएको

अनुबाद गर्नुपर्ने भाषा: अंग्रेजी

Within the space of a few years, the World Food Programme has lost half its budget, which amounts to no more than 3.2 billion. Rich countries do not contribute anymore. They have to rescue their banks. That is to say the speculators.
The fight against world hunger is secondary. I call this a crime against humanity.

Validated by Lein - 2011年 अक्टोबर 31日 15:27

पछिल्ला सन्देशहरु

	लेखक	सन्देश
		2011年 अक्टोबर 29日 00:16
	gamine चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 4611	'In the last/recent years' instead of 'within the space of a few years'. 'That is to say the spÃ©culators'. Something sounds wrong her. Couldn't one just say: 'the speculators' or 'which are the speculators'. Sure you can find somehing, Lein.
		2011年 अक्टोबर 29日 03:49
	gamine चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 4611	Forgot the tittle: I would say 'So, are the international organizations powerless? '
		2011年 अक्टोबर 29日 13:28
	Francky5591 चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 12396	Agree about the title, Lene, Alex should add "are" in the interrogation mode ("are international organizations powerless?" But the rest is OK IMO.
		2011年 अक्टोबर 29日 15:07
	gamine चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 4611	ok boss. I believe you. It's just sounded weird to me, but, as you know, my English .
		2011年 अक्टोबर 29日 15:31
	alexfatt चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 1538	I should have placed "are" before the subject indeed. Thanks for your comments, Lene
		2011年 अक्टोबर 29日 20:55
	itsatrap100 चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 279	The translation seems fine to me, but I'm a bit unsure of the meaning of "plus" in the second sentence. Surely the rich countries are contributing quite a bit of food since they are the countries with the most food surplus.
		2011年 अक्टोबर 30日 00:20
	gamine चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 4611	Hi Alex. It was absolutely nothing. You are a real good translater and expert and help so much. Wish all our translaters were as good, I included
		2011年 अक्टोबर 30日 13:25
	Francky5591 चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 12396	Hi Jens! "ne...plus" here was translated the right way, into French it makes no ambiguity at all, it is translatable with "not...anymore". Have a nice afternoon!
		2011年 अक्टोबर 31日 15:27
	Lein चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 3389	Thanks all Accepted