| | |
| | 29 Październik 2009 19:40 |
| | &? Can we use this rather English short for "and" in Latin? Roman people didn't know it. Hm...
Moreover, it doesn't fit here... if it is to be "et" in Latin... |
| | 29 Październik 2009 20:18 |
| | From my experience with this author, it might mean something in the direction of FURTHERMORE. Does that make sense here? |
| | 29 Październik 2009 20:56 |
| | Yes, it could make more sens here. Thank you, jairhaas. But, why has & appeared here? IMHO it is not Latin short at all? |
| | 30 Październik 2009 12:23 |
| | |
| | 30 Październik 2009 14:05 |
| | The sign appears in the text itself (many times), which is from the 15th century, meaning that at this relatively late stage of the Latin language it actually exists in that language. Or maybe the author borrowed it from Spanish, which is his nationality. |
| | 30 Październik 2009 14:34 |
| | |
| | 30 Październik 2009 15:37 |
| | |