| | |
| | 22 Ianuarie 2009 17:41 |
| TantineNumărul mesajelor scrise: 2747 | |
| | 24 Ianuarie 2009 01:36 |
| handyyNumărul mesajelor scrise: 2118 | Tantine, warn me if I am wrong, but as far as I know if we use "could have (done)", then the meaning becomes "I could do something (in the past), but I didn't do it". If I am right, then, we should use "would have (done)" here. |
| | 24 Ianuarie 2009 04:34 |
| gottoNumărul mesajelor scrise: 3 | i think, earsed isn t rigt choose. it should change with verb delete |
| | 24 Ianuarie 2009 12:27 |
| | Yes, I agree with handyy. |
| | 24 Ianuarie 2009 13:39 |
| | Dear handyy,
you are right with "I could do something (in the past), but I didn't do it".
but it can be also , "if I knew that I could have ...."
or
"if I was in his/her shoes I could have ...."
am I wrong?
|
| | 24 Ianuarie 2009 14:01 |
| handyyNumărul mesajelor scrise: 2118 | Hi Merdogan,
I guess your sentences ("if I knew that I could have ..../if I was in his/her shoes I could have ...." still convey the same meaning. They are indicating something in the past, which could not be changed any more. Namely, if you say "if I knew that, I could have ....", it shows that you are -again- talking about something which could be done in the past, but wasn't done.
I could be wrong, but I think in this way. Tantine, I am waiting for your helpful explanations |
| | 25 Ianuarie 2009 17:11 |
| RiseNumărul mesajelor scrise: 126 | I agree with handyy too. Also I think that present unreal would be more appropriate. |
| | 25 Ianuarie 2009 22:50 |
| TantineNumărul mesajelor scrise: 2747 | Hi merdogan
I agree with handy and rise here
Can you edit, then I will validate
Bises
Tantine |
| | 25 Ianuarie 2009 23:10 |
| | erased yerine baÅŸka bir fiil bulunabilir |
| | 27 Ianuarie 2009 11:45 |
| | Tense'de bir sorun alduğunu düşünüyorum,çünkü bu kullanılan tense geçmişte düzeltmek istediklerimiz için kullanılır,ancak cümleye bakıldığında şimdiki zamandan bahsediyoruz. |
| | 27 Ianuarie 2009 12:37 |
| RiseNumărul mesajelor scrise: 126 | florinka has suggested what I suggested in my previous message. Present unreal should be used.
"I would erase..."
After making this edit it will be okay |
| | 27 Ianuarie 2009 12:40 |
| | erase tam olarak türkçedeki gibi silerdim anlamında değil ortadan kaldırmak anlamında kullanılmış |
| | 29 Ianuarie 2009 11:57 |
| | I would get rid of shamelessness, greed and egocentricity. |
| | 29 Ianuarie 2009 23:40 |
| | |
| | 30 Ianuarie 2009 00:06 |
| TantineNumărul mesajelor scrise: 2747 | Hi All
I think it is the word "erase" that seems to be creating the problem here.
"To erase" means to delete, and can apply to written text, recorded tape, magnetic tape etc... I do not think the word is adapted here.
If we replace "erase" with "eradicate" (which means to get rid of, to discard) the phrase would be much more understandable in English.
Let me know what you think.
Bises
Tantine |
| | 30 Ianuarie 2009 09:41 |
| | Hi Tantine ,
You know better than us.
I agree with you.
Please erase my "erase". |
| | 30 Ianuarie 2009 10:30 |
| TantineNumărul mesajelor scrise: 2747 | Hehe
I will erase your "erase" with my eradicating tool
And I will validate with my validating tool
Bises
Tantine |