| |
|
תרגום - דנית-אנגלית - Naturligvis dur’ du!מצב נוכחי תרגום
קטגוריה מחשבות | | | שפת המקור: דנית
Naturligvis dur’ du! Hvordan kunne du nogensinde tro noget andet? | | |
|
| | תרגוםאנגלית תורגם על ידי Minny | שפת המטרה: אנגלית
Of course, you can! How could you ever think otherwise?
| | you can/you are capable/you are good enough |
|
הודעה אחרונה | | | | | 22 מאי 2010 03:48 | | | | | | 22 מאי 2010 09:50 | | | we can ! | | | 22 מאי 2010 13:16 | | | "Bien sûr que tu en es capable" - est mieux. | | | 22 מאי 2010 13:20 | | | Hehe! nija88, vous êtes sur la page de la version anglaise!
Votre suggestion figure dans les commentaires ajoutés par la traductrice vers le français, qui plus est. | | | 22 מאי 2010 13:23 | | | nija88,
Cette traduction n'est pas en français CC: nija88 | | | 22 מאי 2010 15:28 | | | In Danish it's "you" singular. | | | 22 מאי 2010 17:44 | | | :$ excusez-moi-le, j ai ouvert les deux traduction en m temps et je me suis trompu de fenetre quand j ai écrit le commentaire. | | | 22 מאי 2010 21:16 | | piasמספר הודעות: 8113 | If I understand the Danish source text right (?), this is more about how she/he is as a person. "You are good enough."
I thought that "capable" means that one is capable to DO something? | | | 23 מאי 2010 02:04 | | | Hi Pia. You're right when you say it's about a person.
This sentence is quite weird and difficult to translate. If you have a look in a dictionary, you'll find your translation. But here I agree with Minny. The meaning is something like 'you're able to do something" but on the other hand yours "you're good enough" could work to. I'd suggest, that one of the sentences should be written
in the comment field.
Thanks for your input. I hadn't thought to much about it. CC: pias lilian canale | | | 23 מאי 2010 09:50 | | | If you think that the sentence "Of course, you're capable!" is not good English, then I would go for Aydin1's translation: "Of course you can!".
| | | 23 מאי 2010 12:43 | | | I'd prefer: "Of course you can!..." | | | 23 מאי 2010 14:09 | | | Thanks everyone,
I've placed the options in the remarks. I think that solves the problem |
|
| |
|