原始文本 - 拉丁语 - fons itaque æternalis amor

charisgre,

Is "aternalis" [for "aeternalis"] the only wrong thing here?

CC: charisgre

In my opinion, yes. What do you think?

I was wondering about "itaque", but this is apparently just "ita" + "que". It's odd (at least to me), however, a noun ["fons"] and an adverb ["ita"] to be together with the conjunction "que".

Thanks, charisgre!

CC: charisgre