| |
|
Prevođenje - Srpski-Engleski - valjak za gumu, mlin za gumuTrenutni status Prevođenje
Kategorija Govor - Posao / Zaposlenja Ovaj zahtjev za prijevodom traži "Samo značenje". | valjak za gumu, mlin za gumu | | Izvorni jezik: Srpski
valjak za gumu, mlin za gumu | | proizvodnja, mlevenje otpadne gume |
|
| a cylinder for waste rubber, a mill for waste rubber | PrevođenjeEngleski Preveo lakil | Ciljni jezik: Engleski
a cylinder for waste rubber, a mill for waste rubber | | This really does not make much sense and I used those words as I am not sure what kind of text this is taken from...Tx.:)
Note: If this sentence is part of a "definition" of some kind no articles are used, I think, but if it is taken out of a text articles are used. lakil |
|
Posljednji potvrdio i uredio IanMegill2 - 22 listopad 2007 00:13
Najnovije poruke | | | | | 19 listopad 2007 13:14 | | | In remark about the text it says it is about wasted rubber industry so there are many ways to translate this (too many machines which are doing more or less the same job - roll, crack etc.) Maybe you should just add "wasted" before rubber and leave it like that | | | 19 listopad 2007 14:18 | | | Oh, I see...I did not see that... "wasted" sounds good. Thanks Roller-Coaster. ) | | | 19 listopad 2007 17:56 | | | I googled a bit, seems english language, except perhaps in the circles of people who actually do this has no special word for it either, it has an "apparatus for shredding rubber" and "machines for trituration of rubber" so i'm voting correct | | | 20 listopad 2007 04:22 | | | The article is incorrect here - it is not "a rubber" it is the material "rubber". | | | 20 listopad 2007 11:17 | | | You are right kafetzou...Thank you. It's fixed. ) | | | 21 listopad 2007 11:16 | | | Hello lakil,
does this mean
a cylinder for waste rubber, a mill for waste rubber
i.e. that the rubber was used before, but now it's garbage, and has to be disposed of or recycled or something?
"wasted" rubber is ambiguous, so I want to change it to "waste rubber," if my guess is correct! | | | 21 listopad 2007 16:34 | | | | | | 22 listopad 2007 00:12 | | | Okay, I guess I'll change it and validate it, then!
If anybody has any serious objections, let me know: I'll change it back! |
|
| |
|