| | |
| | 1 Septiembre 2007 10:07 |
| slbgzCantidad de envíos: 77 | ukrainian: переклад зроблено неправильно.
polish: błędne tłumaczenie.
english: translation is done wrong. |
| | 1 Septiembre 2007 07:50 |
| | afkalin, can you check this ? CC: afkalin |
| | 1 Septiembre 2007 10:03 |
| slbgzCantidad de envíos: 77 | correctly:
english: shipping is paid by a recipient
russian: доÑтавка за Ñчёт получателÑ
ukrainian: доÑтавку оплачує отримувач |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 05:20 |
| | What's going on here?
1) The translation seems to have nothing to do with the source text, and
2) Both were submitted by the same person. Could someone who speaks Russian and/or Ukrainian please write to him and ask him what's going on with this? CC: afkalin Melissenta ramarren |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 05:51 |
| | I do not know polish, but, according to the meaning, I would rather agree with slbgz. As to submitter, I do not think that there's any sense to talk to him(her), because if she had known the meaning (translation) she would not have asked Cucumis community... |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 05:55 |
| | But it seems that afkalin has accepted this translation ... |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 09:21 |
| slbgzCantidad de envíos: 77 | I think that afkalin did not have a right to accept translation from Polish as he is not an expert from Polish. |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 10:33 |
| slbgzCantidad de envíos: 77 | an original text is typical formulation, which is used for description of manners of payment and delivery in the internet sales:
http://www.google.com.ua/search?q=transport+koszt+odbiorcy&hl=uk&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:uk-UA:official&hs=GTp&start=10&sa=N
|
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 10:32 |
| slbgzCantidad de envíos: 77 | other variant more correct original text:
«transport towarów odbywa się na koszt odbiorcy»
«transport opłaca odbiorcа»
«transport na koszt odbiorcy»
«koszt dostawy uiszcza odbiorca» |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 15:03 |
| | jp, can you help here? It seems that afkalin has validated a translation that is not valid, and in a language in which he is not an expert.
CC: cucumis |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 15:27 |
| | I've edited the translation with your suggestion, slbgz.
Acutally, afkalin is an expert for the target language, so he has the right to evaluate it. Maybe he did it to quick without using the poll used when we don't know the source language . CC: afkalin |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 15:36 |
| | Oops - I wrote my note too quickly - of course he's an expert for Ukrainian. |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 15:45 |
| slbgzCantidad de envíos: 77 | Thanks,
I accede to you, but, in my opinion, member, which does not own an initial language, not must accept translations from this language… |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 15:53 |
| slbgzCantidad de envíos: 77 | Ооps, jp,
translation on Ukrainian is:
«доÑтавку оплачує отримувач»,
or:
«доÑтавка за рахунок отримувача».
not:
«переклад зроблено неправильно»=«translation is done wrong»
|
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 18:47 |
| | СпаÑибо за иÑправление - приношу Ñвои Ð¸Ð·Ð²Ð¸Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð·Ð° поÑпешно принÑтый ошибочный перевод. |
| | 3 Septiembre 2007 18:57 |
| | afkalin, could you please edit this to a correct translation. I could not understand your note above. CC: afkalin |
| | 4 Septiembre 2007 04:43 |
| | slbgz, we have a system of polls. When the expert doesn't understand the source language, all members who understand the both languages can vote. The experts know if the translation is correctly formed, and the members know if the meaning is correct. After there are enough votes, the expert can make a decision.
I see that afkalin has edited the translation now, thanks |
| | 4 Septiembre 2007 09:28 |
| slbgzCantidad de envíos: 77 | Ok, thanks jp, kafetzou, afkalin |