Traduko - Sveda-Rusa - Att du fÃ¥r en bra mÃ¶dravÃ¥rd med regelbundna...

Nuna stato ‎Traduko

Tiu teksto haveblas en la sekvaj lingvoj:

Ĉi tiu tradukpeto estas "nur por signifo".

Titolo	Att du fÃ¥r en bra mÃ¶dravÃ¥rd med regelbundna...
Teksto Submetigx per kirmahn	Font-lingvo: Sveda Att du fÃ¥r en bra mÃ¶dravÃ¥rd med regelbundna kontroller under graviditeten Ã¤r viktigt och skapar goda fÃ¶rutsÃ¤ttningar fÃ¶r en lyckad fÃ¶rlossning. MÃ¶dravÃ¥rden kommer att skÃ¶tas av en av vÃ¥ra samarbetskliniker.

Titolo

Ð’ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð±ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾ÑÑ‚Ð¸

Traduko

Rusa

Tradukita per

Piagabriella

Cel-lingvo: Rusa

Laste validigita aŭ redaktita de RainnSaw - 27 Februaro 2008 09:54

Lasta Afiŝo

	Aŭtoro	Afiŝo
		10 Januaro 2008 19:28
	pupsik Nombro da afiŝoj: 4	ochen' mnogo povtorenij beremennost', etogo mozhno izbezhat'
		5 Februaro 2008 20:29
	Dasha16 Nombro da afiŝoj: 1	text Ã¤r inte rigtik rÃ¤tt! det finns nÃ¥gra meningar som inte stÃ¤mmer
		5 Februaro 2008 21:06
	Piagabriella Nombro da afiŝoj: 641	Det Ã¤r mycket mÃ¶jligt. (Fast i sÃ¥ fall mÃ¥ste RainnSaw ha missat att rÃ¤tta det...) Kan du fÃ¶reslÃ¥ hur den bÃ¶r Ã¤ndras?
		24 Februaro 2008 20:48
	RainnSaw Nombro da afiŝoj: 76	Piagabriella, Can you explain me, please, what pupsik and Dasha16 commented about this your translation?
		26 Februaro 2008 17:07
	Piagabriella Nombro da afiŝoj: 641	Yes, of course! Dasha writes just that there are a few sentences that are not really correct (I asked her to explain what is wrong, according to her, but unfortunately she didn't do that). Pupsik writes (in russian but with latin letters): ÐžÑ‡ÐµÐ½ÑŒ Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾Ð²Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ€ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¹ Ð±ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾ÑÑ‚ÑŒ, ÑÑ‚Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ Ð¸Ð·Ð±ÐµÐ¶Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒ
		27 Februaro 2008 18:09
	Piagabriella Nombro da afiŝoj: 641	Rainnsaw, shouldn't "Ð²Ð°ÑˆÑƒ" be changed into "ÑÐ²Ð¾ÑŽ"? Unfortunately, I feel rather unsure that this translation tells really the same as the Swedish text now, to me it seems that it got a bit farther from the meaning of the original (but maybe I had made a mistake earlier, and that's why you changed it? In other words - I might of course be wrong)