अनुबाद - स्विडेनी-रूसी - Att du fÃ¥r en bra mÃ¶dravÃ¥rd med regelbundna...

अहिलेको अवस्था ‎अनुबाद

यो हरफ निम्न भाषामा उपलब्ध छ:

This translation request is "Meaning only".

शीर्षक	Att du fÃ¥r en bra mÃ¶dravÃ¥rd med regelbundna...
हरफ kirmahnद्वारा बुझाइएको	स्रोत भाषा: स्विडेनी Att du fÃ¥r en bra mÃ¶dravÃ¥rd med regelbundna kontroller under graviditeten Ã¤r viktigt och skapar goda fÃ¶rutsÃ¤ttningar fÃ¶r en lyckad fÃ¶rlossning. MÃ¶dravÃ¥rden kommer att skÃ¶tas av en av vÃ¥ra samarbetskliniker.

शीर्षक

Ð’ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð±ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾ÑÑ‚Ð¸

अनुबाद

रूसी

Piagabriellaद्वारा अनुबाद गरिएको

अनुबाद गर्नुपर्ने भाषा: रूसी

Validated by RainnSaw - 2008年 फेब्रुअरी 27日 09:54

पछिल्ला सन्देशहरु

	लेखक	सन्देश
		2008年 जनवरी 10日 19:28
	pupsik चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 4	ochen' mnogo povtorenij beremennost', etogo mozhno izbezhat'
		2008年 फेब्रुअरी 5日 20:29
	Dasha16 चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 1	text Ã¤r inte rigtik rÃ¤tt! det finns nÃ¥gra meningar som inte stÃ¤mmer
		2008年 फेब्रुअरी 5日 21:06
	Piagabriella चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 641	Det Ã¤r mycket mÃ¶jligt. (Fast i sÃ¥ fall mÃ¥ste RainnSaw ha missat att rÃ¤tta det...) Kan du fÃ¶reslÃ¥ hur den bÃ¶r Ã¤ndras?
		2008年 फेब्रुअरी 24日 20:48
	RainnSaw चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 76	Piagabriella, Can you explain me, please, what pupsik and Dasha16 commented about this your translation?
		2008年 फेब्रुअरी 26日 17:07
	Piagabriella चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 641	Yes, of course! Dasha writes just that there are a few sentences that are not really correct (I asked her to explain what is wrong, according to her, but unfortunately she didn't do that). Pupsik writes (in russian but with latin letters): ÐžÑ‡ÐµÐ½ÑŒ Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾Ð²Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ€ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¹ Ð±ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾ÑÑ‚ÑŒ, ÑÑ‚Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ Ð¸Ð·Ð±ÐµÐ¶Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒ
		2008年 फेब्रुअरी 27日 18:09
	Piagabriella चिठ्ठीको सङ्ख्या: 641	Rainnsaw, shouldn't "Ð²Ð°ÑˆÑƒ" be changed into "ÑÐ²Ð¾ÑŽ"? Unfortunately, I feel rather unsure that this translation tells really the same as the Swedish text now, to me it seems that it got a bit farther from the meaning of the original (but maybe I had made a mistake earlier, and that's why you changed it? In other words - I might of course be wrong)