Translation - Swedish-Russian - Att du fÃ¥r en bra mÃ¶dravÃ¥rd med regelbundna...

Current status ‎Translation

This text is available in the following languages:

This translation request is "Meaning only".

Title	Att du fÃ¥r en bra mÃ¶dravÃ¥rd med regelbundna...
Text Submitted by kirmahn	Source language: Swedish Att du fÃ¥r en bra mÃ¶dravÃ¥rd med regelbundna kontroller under graviditeten Ã¤r viktigt och skapar goda fÃ¶rutsÃ¤ttningar fÃ¶r en lyckad fÃ¶rlossning. MÃ¶dravÃ¥rden kommer att skÃ¶tas av en av vÃ¥ra samarbetskliniker.

Title

Ð’ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð±ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾ÑÑ‚Ð¸

Translation

Russian

Translated by

Piagabriella

Target language: Russian

Last validated or edited by RainnSaw - 27 February 2008 09:54

Latest messages

	Author	Message
		10 January 2008 19:28
	pupsik Number of messages: 4	ochen' mnogo povtorenij beremennost', etogo mozhno izbezhat'
		5 February 2008 20:29
	Dasha16 Number of messages: 1	text Ã¤r inte rigtik rÃ¤tt! det finns nÃ¥gra meningar som inte stÃ¤mmer
		5 February 2008 21:06
	Piagabriella Number of messages: 641	Det Ã¤r mycket mÃ¶jligt. (Fast i sÃ¥ fall mÃ¥ste RainnSaw ha missat att rÃ¤tta det...) Kan du fÃ¶reslÃ¥ hur den bÃ¶r Ã¤ndras?
		24 February 2008 20:48
	RainnSaw Number of messages: 76	Piagabriella, Can you explain me, please, what pupsik and Dasha16 commented about this your translation?
		26 February 2008 17:07
	Piagabriella Number of messages: 641	Yes, of course! Dasha writes just that there are a few sentences that are not really correct (I asked her to explain what is wrong, according to her, but unfortunately she didn't do that). Pupsik writes (in russian but with latin letters): ÐžÑ‡ÐµÐ½ÑŒ Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾Ð²Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ€ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¹ Ð±ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾ÑÑ‚ÑŒ, ÑÑ‚Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾ Ð¸Ð·Ð±ÐµÐ¶Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒ
		27 February 2008 18:09
	Piagabriella Number of messages: 641	Rainnsaw, shouldn't "Ð²Ð°ÑˆÑƒ" be changed into "ÑÐ²Ð¾ÑŽ"? Unfortunately, I feel rather unsure that this translation tells really the same as the Swedish text now, to me it seems that it got a bit farther from the meaning of the original (but maybe I had made a mistake earlier, and that's why you changed it? In other words - I might of course be wrong)